Skip to main content

harry potter - In The Battle of Hogwarts, why didn't the Mandrakes do more damage?


In the Battle of Hogwarts, Neville tells Harry about a plan:



'Mandrakes!' Neville bellowed at Harry over his shoulder as he ran. 'Going to lob them over the walls - they won't like this!'


Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - p.499 - Bloomsbury - Chapter 31, The Battle of Hogwarts




Now, given that:



'The cry of the Mandrake is fatal to anyone who hears it'


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - p.72 - Bloomsbury - Chapter 6, Gilderoy Lockhart



I would have said this attack is fairly OP (overpowered). And yet, it doesn't seem to have done much damage. Certainly, one is given the very distinct impression that the defenders of Hogwarts are losing when Voldemort calls a ceasefire and none of the big-name Death Eaters seem to have been taken out by the Mandrakes.


So how come?



Answer



There are several things to keep in mind.




  1. According to Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, the cry of a mandrake is only fatal if the mandrake is fully grown. A juvenile mandrake would knock anyone who heard it unconscious for several hours, but its cry would not kill them. Given that the purpose of the battle was to delay (not defeat) Voldemort and the Death Eaters, juvenile mandrakes could have helped to buy time. The books do not clearly state that the mandrakes had reached full killing potential. They were probably not young juvenile plants, but we do not know how large they were, or whether all of them were at the same level of maturity.

  2. There were a lot of Death Eaters. We only know the important ones by name. The fact that none of the Death Eaters we know were stunned or killed by the mandrakes' cries, does not mean that no Death Eaters were affected.

  3. Chamber of Secrets indicates that the school was not in the habit of keeping a large supply of mandrakes. If there are roughly eight people carrying the mandrakes, which appear "large" and "potted," they probably could not have carried more than one at a time--two at the most. That means there were probably somewhere from eight to sixteen mandrake plants--not a huge number. As a result, there may not have been enough to throw over all parts of the castle walls. The mandrakes might have made a difference at a crucial section of the Hogwarts defenses, but there would not have been enough mandrakes to throw at all of the Death Eaters.

  4. For the mandrakes to take effect, they had to be heard--and battles are noisy. There would be yelling, of course--not all wizards are proficient at nonverbal spells, and not all wands will perform them (dogwood wands are known for lacking the ability entirely). Any spells that missed their targets could hit parts of the castle or other physical objects, which would cause additional loud noises. The Death Eaters had also brought along nonhuman allies: the giants, in particular, were known for their loudness. Even if the mandrakes were full grown--which is uncertain--they would not have killed anyone if the battle noise drowned out the screaming mandrakes.


We do not know the extent to which the mandrakes were effective. What we do know is that Neville and the others succeeded in delaying the Death Eaters--and the book does seem to hint that the mandrakes had a part in that achievement.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...