Skip to main content

How does Star Trek faster than light communication work?


In TNG 'Where No One Has Gone Before', the Enterprise is sent hurtling through space past countless galaxies, when the Traveller “upgrades” the ships propulsion. Though the ship is thousands of light years travel away (at warp 9.9), they mention any communication would take 51 years to reach Starfleet.


That means they have communication faster than their maximum warp speed.


How much faster is this communication? I thought warp 9.9 was the Star Trek speed limit?



Answer




Faster-than-light subspace communication is explained in detail in the official Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, by Michael Okuda and Rick Sternbach, who were the principal production designers for TNG.



From Section 8.5 on the "Subspace Communications Network" (click to enlarge):


enter image description here


enter image description here


In particular, under ideal circumstances, subspace communications travel at Warp 9.9997, which is



"...about sixty times faster than the fastest starship..."



according to the Manual.



With that part out of the way...




According to the Manual, Warp 9.9 (Enterprise D's top speed) is 3053 times the speed of light. If subspace communications achieve roughly 60 times this speed, that means that these transmissions travel at approximately 183,180 times the speed of light. Hence, a subspace communication will cover a distance of roughly 183,000 light years in a year.


On the other hand, in the episode we hear:



PICARD: Data, what distance have we travelled?


DATA: 2,700,000 light years.



But 2,700,000 divided by 183,000 is only about 14.75. In other words, it should only take about 15 years for the communication to reach Starfleet, rather than 51!


Of course, the Manual says that Warp 9.9997 is achieved under "ideal galactic conditions". In could be that Data factored in some non-ideal conditions, such as the lack of subspace relay points outside of the galaxy and the Galactic Barrier.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...