Skip to main content

harry potter - When the spell Homenum Revelio is used, what are the limitations placed on the spell?


Can the spell be used only in buildings? Does the size of the building matter or does the spell work across the entire volume of the building? For example, would it be possible to use homenum revelio in the Ministry of Magic? What if the spell was used in the open? Does THE Invisibilty Cloak prove to be impervious against this spell? Is there any concrete proof that this spell can actually pierce the Cloak's protective enchantments?



Answer




Bloomsbury Live Chat



Angela Morrissey: Why is it that albus dumbledore can see harry under his invisibility cloak at certain moments? (during the series is the cloak only infallible to those who do not own a deathly hallow).


J.K. Rowling: Dumbledore, who could perform magic without needing to say the incantation aloud, was using 'homenum revelio' – the human-presence-revealing spell Hermione makes use of in Deathly Hallows.



Homenum revelio



Albus Dumbledore sometimes uses Homenum revelio non-verbally on occasions when Harry Potter is concealed by his Invisibility Cloak, giving the Harry the impression that the Headmaster can see him through the Cloak (BLC, CS14, PS12).



BLC = Bloomsbury Live Chat

CS14 = Cornelius Fudge is the fourteenth chapter of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.
PS12 = The Mirror of Erised is the twelfth chapter of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.



Travers casts Homenum revelio while in Xenophilius Lovegood's house to find out whether Mr. Lovegood's is telling the truth about Harry Potter's presence in his house. Due to the Death Eater's affirmation, after using the spell, that there is "someone up there", when there were in fact three people, it is possible to assume that Homenum revelio does not reveal specifics about the people whose presence the spell detects (DH21).



DH21 = The Tale of the Three Brothers is the twenty-first chapter of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.


It appears that the spell does attempt to search the entire volume and also indicates where (in general) the detected presence is located. As a result, Hermione did not say anything about Harry and Ron being detected, nor did Travers say anything about Lovegood because they could see the person being detected and could ignore the indication.


From the way it is written, it appears that it detects a human presence within a cetain range of the person casting the spell and it would not matter if it is inside or outside. However, it is not mentioned explicitly.


The fact that Dumbledore can detect Harry under the cloak and the way he uses it would seem to confirm this.


The Ministry of magic is probably warded against spells so it could not be used. Additionally, there are probably spell detector alarms in the building.



If there are offices with a night shift, the spell would always give a positive indication in any case.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more