Skip to main content

harry potter - What was Helga Hufflepuff’s animal ‘avatar’?


The four founders of Hogwarts all have alliterative names that give hints as to their personalities (first name) and the values their respective houses seek (surname, through the cultural symbolism associated with various animals, at least in Western Europe):



  • Salazar Slytherin
    Salazar was the name of a Portuguese dictator,1 and Slytherin is of course aimed at the slithering movements associated with snakes, the symbol of Slytherin house, which are frequently associated with evil, poison, and generally badness.

  • Godric Gryffindor
    Godric is an old Germanic name meaning ‘benevolent ruler’ or ‘ruling through goodness’, and Gryffindor is at least a reference to the griffin, a mythical beast half lion and half eagle. The lion (king of the beasts) is associated with bravery and is the symbol of Gryffindor house; the eagle (king of the birds) has similar connotations.

  • Rowena Ravenclaw

    Rowena is probably an old Germanic name meaning something like ‘rejoicing in fame’, and Ravenclaw is obviously a reference to ravens who are associated with intelligence and wisdom (cf. Huginn and Muninn).2

  • Helga Hufflepuff
    Helga is an old Germanic name meaning ultimately just ‘holy’, and Hufflepuff is… well…


Whereas the other three Hogwarts founders have surnames that quite directly reference an animal that is notionally related to both the person and their house (if not actually its mascot), Hufflepuff doesn’t really seem to reference any animal at all—certainly not the house mascot, which is the badger. The Wiki just says that it “could mean ‘huff’ and ‘puff’”, which would at best connect it to the Big Bad Wolf… somehow not likely, I think.


The only thing I can think of that might fit is Puffskeins (or perhaps Pygmy Puffs). They’re at least docile and kindly, and not exactly known for their overflowing intelligence. But then what about ‘huffle’? And what about the fact that what ol’ Helga herself appreciated most seems to have been hard work, dedication, and loyalty?


Has any canon source (the books, Pottermore, Rowling interviews) ever specified what, if any, animal and animal symbolism the name Hufflepuff is supposed to reference?



1 The Wiki claims that “Rowling stated that the name "Salazar Slytherin" was chosen after the Portuguese dictator's name”, but does not mention where she has stated this. Considering that Rowling was living in Portugal when the wrote the first bits, though, it doesn’t seem an unreasonable assumption.


2 Why Rowling chose an eagle, rather than a raven, to be the symbol of Ravenclaw house, I cannot fathom—especially since the eagle is symbolically more closely linked to Gryffindor. But that’s a different question.



# Yes, I know I’m misusing the term ‘avatar’ in the title; anyone can think of a better word, please do let me know, ’cause I couldn’t.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...