Skip to main content

star wars - No Endor wildfires?


As everyone knows, there was no Endor holocaust when the Death Star exploded, even though there probably should have been one. But I've got to wonder about the events immediately prior.


Endor is referred to in Return of the Jedi as a "forest moon," implying that a significant fraction (if not all) of its land surface is covered in the sort of heavy forests we see in the scenes set on Endor. Well, for an hour or so prior to the destruction of the second Death Star, there was a fairly heavy firefight going on in the forest. Bolts of superheated plasma were fired all over, both from blasters and also much heavier machine-mounted weapons, and most of them, fired with typical Stormtrooper accuracy, missed their target and hit some piece of the scenery instead. Speeders and walkers ended up exploding all over the place, and at the very end, a fortified military installation was razed with high explosives, setting off a massive explosion that could be seen for miles around.



And yet, in the celebration scene at the end, we see no evidence of the horrific conflagrations that should have swept through the entire region and devastated the Ewoks' home forest. Does any canonical explanation exist for how this battle never managed to touch off a massive wildfire?



Answer



The clearest answer I can see has to do with the type of forest we're talking about. The Endor scenes were filmed in California's Redwood National Park, which, as I understand it, is technically a rainforest. Redwood forests like this one tend to be extremely damp and receive a lot of rain. If you've ever seen a survival show set in the redwood forests (I believe "Dual Survival" has done an episode there), you know how much trouble the survivalists have in trying to start a campfire. Everything in the forest is soaking wet most of the time.


And redwoods are especially resistant to forest fires: the bark is thick and tough, and the foliage is so far above the ground that a fire on the forest floor can't reach high enough to get the branches and leaves burning. Basically, the outer layer of bark gets scorched, but the tree itself doesn't catch fire, and the blaze just consumes the undergrowth and dead wood laying on the ground, leaving the trees largely unharmed, and even benefitting the trees by fertilizing the soil and making more room for new trees to grow.


I don't think that George Lucas expects us to believe that the trees on Endor are the same species we have on earth, but they are obviously quite similar to redwoods (and again, the trees we are seeing on our screens are in fact redwoods). So the same rules that govern our redwood forests probably apply to Endor's forests as well.


Obviously, our redwoods don't have to deal with plasma bolts and blaster fire, but we could argue that the extreme heat produced by a blaster bolt dissipates so quickly that it doesn't have enough time to start a serious blaze. It might not even be able to penetrate the thick layer of bark on the outside of the tree.


Considering how wet redwood forests are, it is actually kind of surprising that the Ewoks are able to have fires and torches at all. I can only assume that they keep their firewood covered up so it can dry out before they need to use it.


And we could actually ask the same question about all sorts of substances that we see being hit by blaster fire. Why don't people's clothes catch fire when they are shot? Why doesn't anything catch fire when it is shot?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...