Skip to main content

star wars - No Endor wildfires?


As everyone knows, there was no Endor holocaust when the Death Star exploded, even though there probably should have been one. But I've got to wonder about the events immediately prior.


Endor is referred to in Return of the Jedi as a "forest moon," implying that a significant fraction (if not all) of its land surface is covered in the sort of heavy forests we see in the scenes set on Endor. Well, for an hour or so prior to the destruction of the second Death Star, there was a fairly heavy firefight going on in the forest. Bolts of superheated plasma were fired all over, both from blasters and also much heavier machine-mounted weapons, and most of them, fired with typical Stormtrooper accuracy, missed their target and hit some piece of the scenery instead. Speeders and walkers ended up exploding all over the place, and at the very end, a fortified military installation was razed with high explosives, setting off a massive explosion that could be seen for miles around.



And yet, in the celebration scene at the end, we see no evidence of the horrific conflagrations that should have swept through the entire region and devastated the Ewoks' home forest. Does any canonical explanation exist for how this battle never managed to touch off a massive wildfire?



Answer



The clearest answer I can see has to do with the type of forest we're talking about. The Endor scenes were filmed in California's Redwood National Park, which, as I understand it, is technically a rainforest. Redwood forests like this one tend to be extremely damp and receive a lot of rain. If you've ever seen a survival show set in the redwood forests (I believe "Dual Survival" has done an episode there), you know how much trouble the survivalists have in trying to start a campfire. Everything in the forest is soaking wet most of the time.


And redwoods are especially resistant to forest fires: the bark is thick and tough, and the foliage is so far above the ground that a fire on the forest floor can't reach high enough to get the branches and leaves burning. Basically, the outer layer of bark gets scorched, but the tree itself doesn't catch fire, and the blaze just consumes the undergrowth and dead wood laying on the ground, leaving the trees largely unharmed, and even benefitting the trees by fertilizing the soil and making more room for new trees to grow.


I don't think that George Lucas expects us to believe that the trees on Endor are the same species we have on earth, but they are obviously quite similar to redwoods (and again, the trees we are seeing on our screens are in fact redwoods). So the same rules that govern our redwood forests probably apply to Endor's forests as well.


Obviously, our redwoods don't have to deal with plasma bolts and blaster fire, but we could argue that the extreme heat produced by a blaster bolt dissipates so quickly that it doesn't have enough time to start a serious blaze. It might not even be able to penetrate the thick layer of bark on the outside of the tree.


Considering how wet redwood forests are, it is actually kind of surprising that the Ewoks are able to have fires and torches at all. I can only assume that they keep their firewood covered up so it can dry out before they need to use it.


And we could actually ask the same question about all sorts of substances that we see being hit by blaster fire. Why don't people's clothes catch fire when they are shot? Why doesn't anything catch fire when it is shot?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

Could one of Voldemort's Death Eaters have killed or harmed Harry at Privet Drive?

In Order of the Phoenix , Dumbledore explains to Harry the protection that the Dursleys' home provides: While you can still call home the place where your mother's blood dwells, there you cannot be touched or harmed by Voldemort. He shed her blood, but it lives on in you and her sister. Her blood became your refuge. You need return there only once a year, but as long as you can still call it home, there he cannot hurt you. Your aunt knows this. I explained what I had done in the letter I left, with you, on her doorstep. She knows that allowing you houseroom may well have kept you alive for the past fifteen years. Dumbledore says that he cannot be "touched or harmed by Voldemort". Does this mean that he could have sent a Death Eater to just bust down the door and kill Harry, assuming that Voldemort would allow them to? And even if he didn't want them to kill him, could they have harmed him in some other way (e.g. the Cruciatus Curse)? Answer No. Harry was protect...