Skip to main content

telepathy - Can Dr. Antekirtt give hypnotic commands to Carpena from afar?



In Jules Verne, Mathias Sandorf part 4, chapter 1, Dr. Antekirtt (Antékirtt) finds that the prisoner Carpena is very susceptible to hypnosis. Dr. Antekritt hypnotizes him with a silent glance, and retains complete control over his personality. He explains this to Pierre Bathory, and the narration confirms that the doctor was telling the truth:



Le docteur AntĂ©kirtt n’exagĂ©rait en rien.



The doctor also tells Pierre that he will use this control to free Carpena from captivity, and even gives exact hours.


In the next chapter, Dr. Antekirtt talks to the governor about the dangers of hypnosis. He gives the example that if one of the guards happened to be easy to hypnotize, then a prisoner could control them by hypnosis and give them a direct command that allows the prisoner's escape. At this point, the doctor talks about the prisoner giving a command in advance that the guard is to follow at a particular time.


The doctor then offers a demonstration to the governor, claiming that since he has put Carpena under his hypnotic control, he can still give commands to Carpena even from far away.



– Eh bien, cela a suffi Ă  crĂ©er […] entre moi et ce Carpena un lien de suggestion qui le met sous ma domination absolue.


– Quand il est en votre prĂ©sence ?…



– MĂȘme lorsque nous sommes sĂ©parĂ©s l’un de l’autre !



The doctor then demonstrates this remote psychic link by ordering Carpena to come to the governor's residence.


Was Dr. Antekirtt telling the truth about controlling Carpena from afar? Or was he lying, and he had merely given all the necessary commands in advance when he had met Carpena?


It becomes clear later in the chapter that Dr. Antekirrt was lying to the governor about at least some matters, namely about why Carpena jumps into the sea. However, as is usual in Jules Verne's writings, Dr. Antekirrt does later reveal that was only a lie. In contrast, Dr. Antekirrt or the narration never clearly tells us that the doctor was lying to the governor about the remote psychic link, and if he was lying, I would expect Jules Verne to explicitly explain this deception.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...