Skip to main content

biology - How do the Dune sandworms move?


The sandworms of Dune are huge and powerful. But how exactly do they move beneath all that sand? They don't necessarily skim above the surface as they apparently only raise smallish (relative to their diameter) mounds as they move around. What about their physiology allows for such rapid locomotion under (surely) really heavy sand? What happens to the rest of the sand that they dislodge below the surface?


Also, do they always remain close to the surface or do they also "burrow" deep down?


I've only read Dune (the first book) thus far. Please avoid or warn me about spoilers as much as possible.



Answer




It's never explained in detail (at least, not that I recall), but the Worms are segmented, just like the ones you may have encountered in the real world. They move by contracting and expanding their segments, with small spikes (yes, worms really have them) assisting the process. They don't (so far as I recall, although some later books seem to contradict this, and the early books DO mention them eating Sand Plankton) open their mouths and process sand all of the time, the way a worm will tend to do with Dirt, however, they have the advantage of moving thru sand, which is considerably easier to 'push aside', given their size and weight. (The Square-Cube law may make this impossible in RL, for something that size, but given that Frank Herbert never goes into detail, there may be more there than we know of.)


Regardless; they are SciFi Monsters -- some suspension of Disbelief is needed :)


Some worms do stay close to the surface, but some go very deep; there are references in the third book (if I'm remembering correctly) to a worm going deep and sulking after being ridden hard.


Edit - From 'Children of Dune' -



"The worm tired before dawn. Leto slid off its side and watched it dig itself into the dunes, moving slowly in the familiar pattern of the creatures. It would go deep and sulk."



That being said, there is an implied limit to how deep they go; from later in 'Children of Dune',



"It sensed only the sandtrout and would not attack the deep-sand vector of its own kind."



That implies that Sandtrout go deeper than full-blown worms.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion