Skip to main content

star wars - What was C-3PO talking about when he said, “That’s funny, the damage doesn’t look as bad from out here.”


NOTE: Specifically looking for some in-universe explanation; canonical or “legends” is fine. Lots of discussion of this specific line exists online, but nothing seems to go past idle “armchair speculation”; hoping something more solid and substantial can show up here.




At the beginning of the original Star Wars (1977) film, the Rebel Blockade Runner (Tantive IV) is captured by an Imperial Star Destroyer (Devastator) near Tatooine. R2-D2 and C-3PO escape that whole mess by leaving the the ship in an escape pod (aka: lifepod). As their escape pod spirals down to Tatooine, C-3PO states the following:




That’s funny, the damage doesn’t look as bad from out here.



What damage to what doesn’t look as bad from the vantage point of the escape pod? The shooting script for the film (Revised Fourth Draft - January 15, 1976) frames the dialogue as such:



INT. LIFEPOD


Artoo and Threepio look out at the receding Imperial starship. Stars circle as the pod rotates through the galaxy.


THREEPIO: That’s funny, the damage doesn’t look as bad from out here.


Artoo beeps an assuring response.


THREEPIO: Are you sure this things safe?




Is C-3PO somehow referring to the Star Destroyer since that’s what we see on screen (see screenshot) as well as being referenced in the script itself? If so, why is C-3PO interested in the damage to an Imperial Star Destroyer? Is his droid eyesight somehow so strong he could see the Rebel Blockade Runner captured in the docking bay of that Star Destroyer? Heck, was C-3PO even aware of what ship he was on to begin with and maybe thought the Star Destroyer was the ship he was on?


C-3PO and R2-D2 taking in the view from their luxurious escape pod.



Answer



I've always seen this line as a joke, by the way, playing off of C-3PO's relative ignorance of space vessels and technology in general.


The damage in question is almost certainly the damage that Tantive IV logically must have suffered at the hands of Devastator prior to the capture of the former. The movie opens on a battle between the two ships, and we see R2-D2 and C-3PO being pretty much thrown around the interior of Tantive IV from the impacts of Devastator's attack. It's reasonable for C-3PO to imagine heavy damage being suffered.


Prior to Captain Antilles shutting down the main reactor, we see a shot from Devastator cause a large explosion in the middle of Tantive IV. It's doubtful Antilles would shut down the engines unless some critical system were damaged enough that he had to. They did not want to be captured at any cost.


It's unclear whether C-3PO doesn't seem to find the damage looks that bad because he is looking at the underside of Tantive IV, or they are too far away from it to see the damage, or he mistakes Devastator for Tantive IV, but the joke plays either way. There is a long history of 3PO getting it wrong all throughout the canonical and non-canonical "literature" (yes, I called Star Wars "literature" but I chickened out and put it in quotes), although this would seem to be the first obvious example of him being clearly ignorant of things that are not his specialty.


Out of universe: Note that the scene must have been shot before it could have been composited. That means that Daniels would have read his line in filming while looking at a blank space that might have been blue or black, or he might have actually overlaid it afterwards in ADR. Either way, the intention of the script could have been different from what we see because neither the screenwriter nor Daniels would be able to see the final composited shot. When the shot was composited, it might have turned out differently from how it was imagined (or even storyboarded).


Either way, as a joke the line plays regardless of whether he mistakes Devastator for Tantive IV or he just doesn't understand what damage would look like. The fact that it wasn't edited out, either by muting the dialog track or cutting the shot entirely, strongly supports the idea that it was meant to be a joke. Either that, or when editing of the scene was done, a line that wasn't meant to be a joke made Lucas and the editor(s) present laugh hard enough that they left it in.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.