Skip to main content

tolkiens legendarium - Dwarf rings unaccounted for?


The Dwarf Rings are being mentioned at the start of LOTR but no mention is made of them elsewhere despite the nine and three gathering heaps of attention.


While the dwarfs of ME are renowned for sticking to their mining and delving and smithing, only rarely coming out for light and (let's face it) the Elves aren't exactly the friendliest bunch, surely some news of the Dwarf Rings would have come to the attention of the Free peoples?


So what happened to the seven Dwarven rings?




Answer



All of the Dwarf rings are accounted for, either through destruction or recapture. This is mentioned many times in Lord of the Rings, for example Gandalf's words in Shadow of the Past:



Seven the Dwarf-kings possessed, but three he has recovered, and the others the dragons have consumed.



That the ring of Thrór was the last one that the Dwarves possessed is also well recorded; in the Council of Elrond we see Glóin saying the following:



The Seven are lost to us – if Balin has not found the ring of Thrór which was the last...



And also Gandalf's story of his visit to Dol Guldur recounted in the Quest of Erebor (published in Unfinished Tales):




I had entered Dol Guldur in disguise, and had found there an unhappy Dwarf dying in the pits. I had no idea who he was. He had a map that had belonged to Durin's folk in Moria and a key that seemed to go with it, though he was too far gone to explain it. And he said that he had possessed a great Ring.


Nearly all his ravings were of that. The last of the Seven he said over and over again.



This establishes that the fate of the seven Dwarven rings was quite well-known to the Wise.


Sauron kept the three he had recovered for potential future use as bargaining tools; we see an example of this in the story of the messenger from Mordor that Glóin recounts in the Council of Elrond:



Then about a year ago a messenger came to Dáin, but not from Moria – from Mordor: a horseman in the night, who called Dáin to his gate. The Lord Sauron the Great, so he said, wished for our friendship. Rings he would give for it, such as he gave of old.



As for the destruction of the other four, I'm not aware of any source text that explicitly states which dragons had destroyed them, or when they were destroyed, although a hint is given in the Appendices (to Lord of the Rings) recounting the Dwarves stay in the Grey Mountains:




But there were dragons in the wastes beyond; and after many years they became strong again and multiplied, and they made war on the Dwarves, and plundered their works.



How this can be reconciled with the statement in the Silmarillion that "it is said that the foundation of each of the Seven Hoards of the Dwarf-kings of old was a golden ring", I do not know, although the use of "it is said" here is telling: this is evidently a Dwarven origin-myth and perhaps should not be taken literally.


This is essentially all the information that Tolkien ever gave about the seven. We don't know who the other two Dwarves that Sauron recovered the other two rings from were. We don't have clear details on when the other four were destroyed. We don't know which Dwarven households originally held them.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...
Post a Comment
Read more