Skip to main content

tolkiens legendarium - Dwarf rings unaccounted for?


The Dwarf Rings are being mentioned at the start of LOTR but no mention is made of them elsewhere despite the nine and three gathering heaps of attention.


While the dwarfs of ME are renowned for sticking to their mining and delving and smithing, only rarely coming out for light and (let's face it) the Elves aren't exactly the friendliest bunch, surely some news of the Dwarf Rings would have come to the attention of the Free peoples?


So what happened to the seven Dwarven rings?




Answer



All of the Dwarf rings are accounted for, either through destruction or recapture. This is mentioned many times in Lord of the Rings, for example Gandalf's words in Shadow of the Past:



Seven the Dwarf-kings possessed, but three he has recovered, and the others the dragons have consumed.



That the ring of Thrór was the last one that the Dwarves possessed is also well recorded; in the Council of Elrond we see Glóin saying the following:



The Seven are lost to us – if Balin has not found the ring of Thrór which was the last...



And also Gandalf's story of his visit to Dol Guldur recounted in the Quest of Erebor (published in Unfinished Tales):




I had entered Dol Guldur in disguise, and had found there an unhappy Dwarf dying in the pits. I had no idea who he was. He had a map that had belonged to Durin's folk in Moria and a key that seemed to go with it, though he was too far gone to explain it. And he said that he had possessed a great Ring.


Nearly all his ravings were of that. The last of the Seven he said over and over again.



This establishes that the fate of the seven Dwarven rings was quite well-known to the Wise.


Sauron kept the three he had recovered for potential future use as bargaining tools; we see an example of this in the story of the messenger from Mordor that Glóin recounts in the Council of Elrond:



Then about a year ago a messenger came to Dáin, but not from Moria – from Mordor: a horseman in the night, who called Dáin to his gate. The Lord Sauron the Great, so he said, wished for our friendship. Rings he would give for it, such as he gave of old.



As for the destruction of the other four, I'm not aware of any source text that explicitly states which dragons had destroyed them, or when they were destroyed, although a hint is given in the Appendices (to Lord of the Rings) recounting the Dwarves stay in the Grey Mountains:




But there were dragons in the wastes beyond; and after many years they became strong again and multiplied, and they made war on the Dwarves, and plundered their works.



How this can be reconciled with the statement in the Silmarillion that "it is said that the foundation of each of the Seven Hoards of the Dwarf-kings of old was a golden ring", I do not know, although the use of "it is said" here is telling: this is evidently a Dwarven origin-myth and perhaps should not be taken literally.


This is essentially all the information that Tolkien ever gave about the seven. We don't know who the other two Dwarves that Sauron recovered the other two rings from were. We don't have clear details on when the other four were destroyed. We don't know which Dwarven households originally held them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...