Skip to main content

harry potter - What is the Economic system of the Potterverse?


The annual student intake of Hogwarts seems about 100. Since in book 7 Hogwarts is declared mandatory for all children, this means that the total magical population of Britain cannot be much more than 10,000.


How do these people make a living?



All jobs mentioned in the books are non-productive occupations (government, stores, sports &c) - not farmers or engineers. There are exceptions - makers of wands/robes/broomsticks - but where do they get the raw materials from?


Who and how "creates goods" in the wizarding world?


Note that if you say "wizards exchange their gold for Muggle money and buy stuff from Muggles (through intermediaries, if necessary)" then you would have to explain where they get their gold: they would either have to mine it, or produce something of value to the Muggles (in which case the separate financial system of galleons/sickles/knuts does not make sense).


PS. A simple issue of maintaining a steam locomotive for Hogwarts express is pretty much insurmountable for 10k people - without Magic, that is. So, I can imagine that the skilled tradesmen can transfigure dirt into raw materials for their trade - except for food, which "is the first of the five Principal Exceptions to Gamp's Law of Elemental Transfiguration".



Answer



TL;DR:


To misquote an apocryphal Tolkien-derived work "The last Ring-Bearer": "It is rather hard to analyze the reign of the first Princes of Ithilien, Faramir and Éowyn, in political or economical terms – it appears that they had neither politics nor economics over there, but only a never-ending romantic ballad".


In other words, Potterverse has no economic system we can coherently and logically deduce or find, because Rowling didn't put one in.




In-universe details:



You have to remember that Potterverse's Wizarding world is a weird combination of magic (meaning, a lot of their basic needs are taken care of "for free", except for food - basically, they are closer to Star Trek's Post-scarcity economy than to anything else), and late medieval/early modern Muggle society, which is when they separated from Muggles - culminating in full separation under statutes of secrecy in 1689.


As such, there seems to be a somewhat late feudal/early bourgeois trade system (you have trade shops, such as Madame Malkin's clothing, or Ollivander's Wands, or Zonko's, or various inns/taverns). You have a primitive bank (Goblin) that doesn't appear to do anything aside from holding money and valuables and facilitating ForEx trade (e.g. muggle money exchange). You have a very large government that pays salaries and seems to employ a large proportion of wizarding population.


There doesn't appear to be anything like a capitalist system (rich families are rich because they inherit old money, except for a rare and likely unique case of a startup in the form of Weasley's Wizarding Wheezes with Harry as angel investor). There's no mention of investments aside from that, or from capital accumulation, etc...


However, we ALSO don't see a proper feudal system, with no vassals being granted land by their liege lords.


As a matter of fact, aside from Weasley's garden and Hagrid growing some produce in Hogwarts, we don't see ANY agriculture... despite food being the one known exception from being magically created out of thin air.




Out of universe, this is explained by 2 things:




  • These are magic books for child audiences. What do 11-year-olds care about economics? Most boring subject possible.





  • JKR isn't exactly an economics maven. She went from a welfare case to multimillionaire practicably overnight, and as far as I'm aware was a liberal arts major/worker before that, and based on some of her non-Potter writings, has a very poor understanding of what makes economy tick.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...