Skip to main content

Why did the Doc refuse to let Marty tell him about the night Marty went back to 1955?


On more than one occasion in Back to the Future, Marty tries to warn 1955-Doc that he will be shot on the night he tests the DeLorean. The first time, he tells Marty to shut up and says something like "I don't want you to endanger my future the way you endangered your own future". But even from Marty's perspective in 1985, any potential consequences of telling the Doc about the shooting would only affect the "real" future, i.e., things that hadn't happened yet in any timeline.


This is very different from Marty's situation in 1955 - by changing the course of events, he was creating a very real possibility of negating his own existence (as well as the existence of his siblings). But 1955-Doc learning that Libyans would try to kill him in 30 years does not pose similar problems. No one who already exists will cease to exist, and the changes that would proceed from the Doc wearing body armor would have no effect on current events only things that had not yet come to pass (in any timeline). In fact, I can't see how it would change anything other than 1985-Doc dying.


Am I missing something here? How is Marty changing his own past anything like him changing the Doc's future? Is it actually dangerous for 1955-Doc to hear that he will be shot?



Answer




But 1955-Doc learning that Libyans would try to kill him in 30 years does not pose similar problems.



This isn't necessarily the case. From Doc's point of view, he didn't know the threat that was facing him. If he had known about the Libyan terrorists killing him, he may have decided not to go through with developing the time machine, as it may have got him to think about the problems a time machine would face (namely creating paradoxes) which (ironically) would have created the paradox where he wouldn't develop a time machine because of information which was given to him from someone operating his own time machine. Alternatively, he may have built the time machine and tried to source the plutonium from somewhere else, getting himself caught, meaning he couldn't show Marty the time machine (another paradox) or given up on the time machine realising it was too dangerous to try and use plutonium which was necessary for the 1.21 jigawatts. The potentials for creating a paradox is huge.



Hence, to Doc, information about the night of his death that Marty was trying to give him probably looked like it was too likely to cause a paradox.


Doc also didn't know what other information Marty was going to give him about the future - and information about the future can cause all sorts of trouble, which forms the basis of the plot with Biff in Back to the Future II


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.