Skip to main content

What was Harry’s choice at the end of Deathly Hallows?


Towards the end of Deathly Hallows, Harry is presented with a choice:



“I’ve got to go back, haven’t I?”


“That is up to you.”



“I’ve got a choice?”


“Oh yes.” Dumbledore smiled at him. “We are in King’s Cross, you say? I think that if you decided not to go back, you would be able to… let’s say… board a train.”


“And where would it take me?”


“On,” said Dumbledore simply.


— Chapter 35 (King’s Cross)



What was this choice supposed to be?


Had Harry chosen not to go back, what would have happened? His body was lying in the Forbidden Forest, and he wasn’t dead:



“But you’re dead,” said Harry.



“Oh yes,” said Dumbledore matter-of-factly.


“Then . . . I’m dead too?”


“Ah,” said Dumbledore, smiling still more broadly. “That is the question, isn’t it? On the whole, dear boy, I think not.” They looked at each other, the old man still beaming. “Not?” repeated Harry.


“Not,” said Dumbledore.


— Chapter 35 (King’s Cross)



Had Harry boarded a train, where would it have taken him? What did Dumbledore mean by "On" What would have happened to his body lying in the Forbidden Forest? Can someone explain the scenario?



Answer



He was in a “limbo” state between life and death. Had he chosen to “go on”, his spirit/soul would have gone on to the afterlife, and his body would be dead.


The idea of limbo comes from an interview with J.K. Rowling, shortly after the publication of Deathly Hallows:




In the chapter of King’s Cross, are they behind the veil or in some world between the real world and the veil?


You can make up your own mind on this, but I think that Harry entered a kind of limbo between life and death.


— J.K. Rowling and the Live Chat, Bloomsbury.com (July 2007)



It’s clearly established in the Harry Potter universe that there is something after death: perhaps a heaven or an afterlife; canon doesn’t go into detail.


For Harry, the real King’s Cross station represents the boundary between the world of the Dursleys and the world of Hogwarts. As Dumbledore indicates, the exact appearance of limbo is unique to Harry – Dumbledore doesn’t seem to have any awareness of what Harry is seeing.


In this limbo state, Harry is presented a choice, and it’s implied that he really can choose either option:



“I’ve got to go back, haven’t I?”



“That is up to you.”


“I’ve got a choice?”


“Oh yes.” Dumbledore smiled at him. “We are in King’s Cross, you say? I think that if you decided not to go back, you would be able to… let’s say… board a train.”


“And where would it take me?”


“On,” said Dumbledore simply.


Silence again.


— Deathly Hallows, chapter 35 (King’s Cross)



His two choices are:





  • Return to the battle, and his body. Although his body has been hit with a Killing Curse, his spirit has not moved irrevocably to the afterlife, and he can return. This is the option he takes.




  • Leave the mortal plane behind. When Dumbledore says “on”, he means the afterlife. Whether Harry would actually board a train, or if this is just a metaphor on Dumbledore’s part, isn’t clear. But if he chose this option, then his spirit would never return to the body lying in the Forest, and he would truly be dead.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more