Skip to main content

star wars - Why are Jedi more agile in T-Canon than G-Canon?


In comparing characters' actions in Episodes I-VI vs. The Clone Wars, one consistent difference is the physical ability of the Jedi. When the same Jedi character is depicted in both sources--for example, Anakin Skywalker--in The Clone Wars that character is invariably much faster, more graceful in movement, and able to perform more difficult and dangerous acrobatic feats.


Out-of-universe, I assume this is because it is possible to exercise tighter control over movement by a computer-generated character than by a stunt performer.


But is there an in-universe explanation as to why the Jedi are more physically fit in T-Canon than as seen in G-Canon? I'm looking for an explicit reference in T-Canon to, e.g., a type of Force usage training that is absent from G-Canon and would account for the difference in characters' physical prowess.


Or is T-Canon simply meant to represent a more "legendary" depiction of Jedi action and G-Canon a more "realistic" one, hence the differing levels of canon authority?



Answer



While (to my knowledge) it was never directly addressed in-universe in so many words (i.e. you will not find an explicit reference), you have to keep in mind the context of what the Jedi are doing:


In Episodes I-III, the Jedi spend a lot of time... sitting. And meditating, sure, but while that may improve their connection to the Force and ability to use it, it's going to hurt their physical ability (which we know from various C-Canon sources is important as well, not least because the more honed their physical reflexes are, the more they can devote their mental focus during a fight to using the Force rather than deciding which way to step1). To be sure, there is training going on -- and we certainly see some impressive fruits of that training -- but outside of that they're still doing a lot of sitting.



In The Clone Wars, however, when they're not training, they're fighting a war. That's going to hone their reflexes and improve their physical fitness quite a lot (and not only because those who don't improve get dead). We see the same effect in the real world -- soldiers who are serving outside of war zone may be fit, but send them into an active combat situation and their physical fitness and reflexes improve dramatically. Not at all unexpected when you consider things like running around with 60-pound packs while taking fire and shooting back. (Sure, the Jedi still spend time sitting during this time, but the whole fighting a war thing severely cuts into their leisure time -- wars are awful inconvenient like that.)


(Note: The sitting-vs-fighting a war thing is a deliberate over-simplification to make a point. Yes, Jedi do more than just sit around, but so do real-life soldiers and yet you see the same marked improvement in physical prowess when a soldier is sent into an active war zone. [Source: First-hand knowledge, i.e. I've seen precisely this among soldier friends training at home, and then seeing them freshly back from a tour or three in the Middle East.])


In Episodes IV-VI, we see:



  • Obi-Wan: An old man who, despite his strong connection to the Force, is just getting too old for this.

  • Yoda: Even older than Obi-Wan! And he stands in very marked contrast to the nimble little muppet we see in the prequels, all but proving this point that he's just gotten old. (That said, though, we never see him in a context where acrobatic feats would be expected, so...)

  • Vader: Most of his body isn't even his body any more, and while the cybernetics seem really danged good that's going to impair his physical ability and prowess. Not to mention that he's gotten into the whole Jedi sitting thing (well, okay, he seems to stand mostly, but similar effect).

  • Palpatine: He was never (to my knowledge, anyway -- haven't seen all of Clone Wars) an agile combatant I forgot about his duel with Yoda in the prequel trilogy, but nonetheless he's primarily a manipulator behind the scenes (presumably far more so once he had an entire empire to do his bidding), and in any case by these films he's taken the Jedi sitting thing to a whole new level!

  • Luke: Brand new to this whole Force/Jedi/etc. thing. Naturally you can't expect him to match the physical prowess of life-long trained Jedi like Obi-Wan at his physical peak. He still pulls off some impressive acrobatics despite being so raw, in excess of what the others can do, but he's also more youthful and energetic than all the rest as well.



That said, even though all of this is so plausible to the point that anything else would strain credulity, I suspect the real reason is the out-of-universe one: Clone Wars' Jedi are more acrobatic because pure-CG can do a lot more; Eps I-III are next because modern technology let them do a lot more than they could in the originals; and finally Eps IV-VI are relatively limited because the technology was relatively limited. As well I strongly suspect that the long-running nature of Clone Wars contributed to a sort of "power creep", where Jedi necessarily had to get more and more powerful/impressive to keep viewers, well, impressed.


The different canon "levels" don't present a "legendary" vs "realistic" depiction of the Jedi; rather, they exist to acknowledge that Lucas, as the legitimate "owner" of the universe, is the only one with final say in what is and is not part of his world (G-Canon); the TV shows (T-Canon) add to it, and are considered "higher" than the books etc. (C-Canon), because of the closer adherence to Lucas' expressed vision. [Yes, this paragraph ignores that Lucas has sold Star Wars to Disney, but Disney in turn has declared everything below T-Canon is no longer canon at all, while simultaneously folding G- and T-Canons into a single, unified canon. Thus any discussion of canon levels implicitly also ignores this transfer of ownership.]




1 Stated multiple times in e.g. Path of Destruction, during any of the myriad lightsaber training sessions; granted that's specifically noted within the context of training lightsaber styles and sequences, but the principle is obviously applicable to other physical feats as well.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.