Skip to main content

comics - Keeping track of continuities


I'm trying to get back into marvel comics (specifically, but I'm guessing a more general answer would benefit the masses here) and I'm struggling to pin down which comic lines occur in the same multiverse. Is there some database of all linked comics?


My multiverse, I mean lines of comics. For example, I'd say that Uncanny X-men and Ultimate X-Men have different continuities, and thus different multiverses. They can never cross over.


As an example, I've reccently acquired Wolverine and the X-men and X-force, both of which contain Wolverine do something different (Running a school vs being part of a ninja-esque task force) at comepletely the same time (as far as I can tell), so it seems unlikely they're from the same multiverse.


How can I keep track of all the continuities?




Answer



There is no standard, universal way across companies.


Historically, the main Marvel Universe has been Earth 616 with alternate timelines (eg: The Days of Future Past timeline) being part of stories within the main books. As confusing as it has been, there have been points in time where a single character was the star of multiple books - where their adventures could not possibly take place concurrently. Spider-Man was the most guilty of this in the Marvel world, in my opinion. I recall him having something like 4 books of his own in the early to mid 90's.


In the past, there was a series called "What If..." where each book was a separate timeline separate from the main timeline and separate from each other. They had no bearing whatsoever on the Earth 616 continuity.


Roughly 10 years ago (maybe closer to 12), the Ultimates timeline was introduced. All of the associated books were titled "Ultimate [character/team name]" to make it easy to distinguish between the "main" continuity and this new set of reboots.


Your question regarding the non-Ultimate Wolverine and X-team books, while valid, makes the false assumption that they are NOT the same timeline. It's always been a little bit confusing as they're published at the same time and sometimes stories cross over from book-to-book, but one must often assume (or more correctly, accept) that certain stories take place before or after another.


When Jim Lee split the X-Men team into X-men and Uncanny X-Men, this was less of an issue as he did so, in part, to give more feature time to all of the characters. With such a huge roster, there was just no way to give attention to everybody's favorite character. But even then, Wolverine, for example already had his own book. It was meant to tell the stories of what he did on his time off from the X-Men, or before his affiliation with them.


Similarly, team books with prominent characters have always had this issue. Captain America, Spider-Man, Iron Man, Batman, Superman, Green Lantern - the list goes on and on. They're all members (at least part time) of groups that have their own comic series - and they all have their own personal books as well.


DC Comics, on the other hand, just relaunched their "New 52" where they simply wiped the slate clean with ALL of their books - not just a select group as with Marvel's "Ultimates". Whether readers like the new changes or not, it certainly does make it easier to keep the difference straight.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.