Skip to main content

comics - Keeping track of continuities


I'm trying to get back into marvel comics (specifically, but I'm guessing a more general answer would benefit the masses here) and I'm struggling to pin down which comic lines occur in the same multiverse. Is there some database of all linked comics?


My multiverse, I mean lines of comics. For example, I'd say that Uncanny X-men and Ultimate X-Men have different continuities, and thus different multiverses. They can never cross over.


As an example, I've reccently acquired Wolverine and the X-men and X-force, both of which contain Wolverine do something different (Running a school vs being part of a ninja-esque task force) at comepletely the same time (as far as I can tell), so it seems unlikely they're from the same multiverse.


How can I keep track of all the continuities?




Answer



There is no standard, universal way across companies.


Historically, the main Marvel Universe has been Earth 616 with alternate timelines (eg: The Days of Future Past timeline) being part of stories within the main books. As confusing as it has been, there have been points in time where a single character was the star of multiple books - where their adventures could not possibly take place concurrently. Spider-Man was the most guilty of this in the Marvel world, in my opinion. I recall him having something like 4 books of his own in the early to mid 90's.


In the past, there was a series called "What If..." where each book was a separate timeline separate from the main timeline and separate from each other. They had no bearing whatsoever on the Earth 616 continuity.


Roughly 10 years ago (maybe closer to 12), the Ultimates timeline was introduced. All of the associated books were titled "Ultimate [character/team name]" to make it easy to distinguish between the "main" continuity and this new set of reboots.


Your question regarding the non-Ultimate Wolverine and X-team books, while valid, makes the false assumption that they are NOT the same timeline. It's always been a little bit confusing as they're published at the same time and sometimes stories cross over from book-to-book, but one must often assume (or more correctly, accept) that certain stories take place before or after another.


When Jim Lee split the X-Men team into X-men and Uncanny X-Men, this was less of an issue as he did so, in part, to give more feature time to all of the characters. With such a huge roster, there was just no way to give attention to everybody's favorite character. But even then, Wolverine, for example already had his own book. It was meant to tell the stories of what he did on his time off from the X-Men, or before his affiliation with them.


Similarly, team books with prominent characters have always had this issue. Captain America, Spider-Man, Iron Man, Batman, Superman, Green Lantern - the list goes on and on. They're all members (at least part time) of groups that have their own comic series - and they all have their own personal books as well.


DC Comics, on the other hand, just relaunched their "New 52" where they simply wiped the slate clean with ALL of their books - not just a select group as with Marvel's "Ultimates". Whether readers like the new changes or not, it certainly does make it easier to keep the difference straight.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...