Skip to main content

the lord of the rings - How exactly is the Secret Fire similar to the Holy Spirit?


The Wikipedia article on the Secret Fire/Flame Imperishable lists "Clyde S. Kilby. Tolkien & The Silmarillion. Harold Shaw, 1976, p. 59." as a reference for the following statement:




Tolkien described it as similar to the Christian Holy Spirit.



From the Wikipedia article, it's entirely unclear (to someone with very little familiarity with Catholicism) in what way it is similar.


Can someone please clarify?



Answer



This is mainly covered in the Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth (published in Morgoth's Ring) where the main text states:



Eru Himself must at some time come to oppose Melkor. But Eru could not enter wholly into the world and its history ... Finrod therefore thinks that He will, when He comes, have to be both 'outside' and inside; and so he glimpses the possibility of complexity or of distinctions in the nature of Eru, which nonetheless leaves Him 'The One'.




This is clearly based on the Christian concept of the Holy Trinity; in particular the Wikipedia article contains the following statement which is almost an exact paraphrase of Tolkien's last line above:



The three persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature".



Regarding the Secret Fire, or Flame Imperishable, the passage I've quoted contains a direction to Author's Note 11, which I'll quote in full:



This is actually already glimpsed in the Ainulindale', in which reference is made to the 'Flame Imperishable'. This appears to mean the Creative activity of Eru (in some sense distinct from or within Him), by which things could be given a 'real' and independent (though derivative and created) existence. The Flame Imperishable is sent out from Eru, to dwell in the heart of the world, and the world then Is, on the same plane as the Ainur, and they can enter into it. But this is not, of course, the same as the re-entry of Eru to defeat Melkor. It refers rather to the mystery of 'authorship', by which the author, while remaining 'outside' and independent of his work, also 'indwells' in it, on its derivative plane, below that of his own being, as the source and guarantee of its being.



So the Flame Imperishable is seen as being part of, or indeed one with, Eru, but yet separate from him and representing his creative force which he put into the world and which he used to give life to his Children. The Ainulindale actually makes it explicit (thus making definite Tolkien's "appears to mean" above) that the Flame Imperishable is the means by which other things may be created, when discussing the origins of Melkor's Fall:




He had gone often alone into the void places seeking the Imperishable Flame; for desire grew hot within him to bring into Being things of his own...



So that already gives us a Trinity in Arda: Eru, the Flame Imperishable, and Finrod's prophecy of Eru entering into the world, which when compared to the Christian Trinity may correspond (in order) to the Father, the Spirit and the Son.


Getting back to the Flame Imperishable and it's use as a creative mechanism, the Nicene Creed (used in Catholic prayer) contains the following line:



We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life



Again, and especially with the "giver of life" part, this can be seen to have a correspondance.


There are other correspondances in the Athrabeth, relating to the words "breath", "fire" and "spirit", which may be viewed in the light of the Greek pneuma, used in the Bible texts, and translated spirit, wind or life, so Tolkien is definitely using similar terminology throughout this work.


However, this is all something that Tolkien himself was hugely uneasy about, and CT cites a note in his commentary on the Athrabeth:




Already it is (if inevitably) too like a parody of Christianity.



Although these are all from works not published until after Kilby's book, it is known that Kilby worked with Tolkien in 1964, that he had access to the Silmarillion papers (he was indeed the first "outsider" to see it), that the Athrabeth was in existence by that time (CT dates it to 1959), and that Tolkien viewed it as being part of the Silmarillion; as CT notes:



On one of these wrappers my father added: 'Should be last item in an appendix' (i.e. to The Silmarillion).



It is therefore likely that Kilby saw and read the Athrabeth.


I'm not aware of any place where Tolkien explicitly stated that the Flame Imperishable actually was Arda's version of the Holy Spirit, so I read Kilby's words as saying that Tolkien just described it in similar terms, although I don't have his book and so can't comment on what his exact statement may have been.





2014-09-08: Added in reference to this question: Was there a trinity in Eru?


Since I dealt with the Holy Spirit above, it's reasonable to ask if the Trinity is completed with the addition of a Son in Tolkien's writings. The answer is "yes", again sourced from the Athrabeth:



'What then was this hope, if you know?' Finrod asked.


'They say,' answered Andreth: 'they say that the One will himself enter into Arda, and heal Men and all the Marring from the beginning to the end. This they say also, or they feign, is a rumour that has come down through years uncounted, even from the days of our undoing.'



This does serve to reinforce Tolkien's "parody of Christianity" opinion, and may explain why CT omitted the Athrabeth from the published Silmarillion, despite it being, as he notes in his introduction:



... a major and finished work, and is referred to elsewhere as if it had for my father some 'authority'...




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.