Skip to main content

alien franchise - Why Do Facehuggers Fit Human Faces So Perfectly?


As seems to happen so often when we read one question here, another comes to mind.


While I liked the original Alien and the first and third sequels (and saw all four), I never wanted to see Alien vs. Predator and I'm not up with all the details. And when reading this question it reminded me of another question that's bothered me for a few decades.


The facehugger seems to have evolved specifically to target a human face. It always seemed odd the Space Jockey's ship crashed, since it had a trunk, like an elephant, and the facehugger wouldn't work on that kind of face. Even on Earth, there are examples of species that a facehugger won't work on, like an elephant, or likely on a large snake (there's nothing to grab on to).


Is there any reason given, in-universe, for the reason why a facehugger seems to be such a perfect fit to humanoids? Is there a reference to a common host species on the alien's homeworld that is enough like humans that there was a parallel evolution? Or do we find out, at some point, perhaps, that humans were an intended target from the start?


Or is this just due to convenience from a production standpoint, with no in-universe explanation?




Answer



The Facehuggers are actually a pretty versatile design, so I'm not sure I agree that they seem tailored to human-sized heads.


Their legs are considerably longer than they would need to be to cling securely to a human face, as is their tail, as we can see here: Like a glove!


In that shot, the second finger joint reaches to the back of the skull. However, they have a third joint beyond that, which we can see here:


Facehugger 2


There does seem to be a size difference between the Facehuggers in those two images, but both can clearly hold a head significantly larger than a human head with just their "fingers".


Similarly, their tail can wrap around something much thicker than a human neck. This can be clearly seen in both images.


Additionally, we've seen evidence from the movies (particularly the AVP movies) that aliens are also suited to "impregnate" the Predator species, even though their skulls are considerably wider, and their necks are thicker:


A face only Arnie could love!


Finally, there's no reason to believe that the only way they can implant eggs is to wrap their "fingers" around a humanoid head. In the first Alien movie, it was demonstrated in the very first appearance of a Facehugger that they could almost instantly burrow through very tough materials, including the helmet of a space environmental suit.



It is entirely plausible that the Facehuggers could attach by burying the tips of their "fingers" directly into the flesh of aliens whose "mouths" were on a different type of surface, even a relatively flat plane. Similarly, the tail could be used to secure itself to a variety of smaller surfaces.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...