Skip to main content

tolkiens legendarium - How widespread is arboreal sentience in LOTR?


I am curious as to what we know about the intelligence of trees/tree-folk in Middle Earth. Certainly, Fangorn forest contains many self-aware trees, whether they are huorn or ent. There are hold-overs from the ancient forest such as "old man willow" in the Barrow-Downs. We also have the idea of sentience being contagious/able to be passed on/awoken, to some extent. The huorn can be roused, trees can become more entish, and ents slowly become more tree-ish; but could a seedling planted in the fourth age be 'awoken'? I realize that such a seedling wouldn't become an ent, since we know young ents are 'entings', but maybe a huorn?


I have always rationalized that Yavanna brought forth the ents to defend the forest as a whole, rather than individual, non-sentient trees- which is why they are supportive of(if not entirely enthusiastic about) agrarian races like hobbits and men; who may clear trees, but don't represent the massive, industrialized threat of Sauron and Sarumon. After all, entwives are said to prefer fields/meadows- which is a bit macabre if thinking, but nonspeaking, trees were chopped down to make them. However, I have little hard evidence for this being a correct interpretation.



TL;DR- How widespread is sentience in the forests of middle earth, and what is the 'starting' and potential intelligence of trees planted in the later ages of ME?



Answer



One of the central tenets of Tolkien's mythology is that a sentient (he would say "rational") creature must have a soul. Elves have souls, Men and Hobbits have souls, Dwarves have souls, rabbits do not.


So in order for a tree to "go Entish", as Treebeard says, it must acquire a soul from somewhere.


As far as Huorns go, we're never given an explicit confirmation of their origin; but there are two guesses.


Ents Going Treeish


This is Merry's theory; from The Two Towers:



Treebeard won't say much about them, but I think they are Ents that have become almost like trees, at least to look at.


The Two Towers Book III Chapter 9: "Flotsam and Jetsam"




If this is true, then we have to ask where Ents come from. The best information I've been able to find on that subject is from a note at the end of Letter 247, where Tolkien writes (emphasis mine):



No one knew whence they (Ents) came or first appeared. The High Elves said that the Valar did not mention them in the 'Music'. But some (Galadriel) were [of the] opinion that when Yavanna discovered the mercy of Eru to Aulë in the matter of the Dwarves, she besought Eru (through Manwë) asking him to give life to things made of living things not stone, and that the Ents were either souls sent to inhabit trees, or else that slowly took the likeness of trees owing to their inborn love of trees.


The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien 247: To Colonel Worskett. September 1963



This letter presents two possibilities, but neither seems open to the idea of newly-planted trees becoming sentient:



  1. Ents are trees with souls, in which case the only way a newly-planted tree can become sentient is by acquiring a soul; this is probably impossible, unless Eru really, really happens to like that tree

  2. Ents are tree-shaped spirits, in which case they're not actually trees at all, and are unconnected to them; they just become more like trees over time, until eventually they go to sleep forever



In which case, you can't plant a tree and expect it to wake up and start talking to you. That's just not how it works.


Then again, that's only one guess.


Trees Going Entish


Treebeard admits this as a possibility:



Some of us are still true Ents, and lively enough in our fashion, but many are growing sleepy, going tree-ish, as you might say. Most of the trees are just trees, of course; but many are half awake. Some are quite wide awake, and a few are, well, ah, well getting Entish. That is going on all the time.


The Two Towers Book III Chapter 4: "Treebeard"



As I said before, the only way for a creature to become rational is to acquire a soul; but only Eru can make souls (or provide a mechanism for their creation, such as the begetting of children). So it has to come from somewhere.



The most plausible explanation is that these trees are being inhabited by pre-existing spirits, possibly of a lower order than the Valar or Maiar. In The Silmarilion, Manwë says:



When the Children awake, then the thought of Yavanna will awake also, and it will summon spirits from afar, and they will go among the [fauna] and the [flora], and some will dwell therein, and be held in reverence, and their just anger shall be feared.


The Silmarillion III Quenta Silmarillion Chapter 2: "Of Aulë and Yavanna"



Presumably, then, these "trees getting Entish" are trees that have attracted the attention of some spirit floating around, and they decide to inhabit it and take it for a spin.


Which is correct?


I've presented two theories, but unfortunately they're equally possible and Tolkien himself never comes down on which one; he wrote precious little about the Huorns.


It is worth noting, however, that Treebeard's knowledge is not infallible; Tolkien writes in the draft Letter 153:




Treebeard is a character in my story, not me; and though he has a great memory and some earthy wisdom, he is not one of the Wise, and there is quite a lot he does not know or understand.


The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien Letter 153: To Peter Hastings (draft). September 1954



So we really don't know.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...