Skip to main content

When did they cure the common cold in Star Trek?


In the Next Generation, Beverly Crusher mentions the common cold has been eradicated. In Enterprise, Malcolm Reed gets the common cold, much to his consternation, for which he shouts something like "We can travel faster than the speed of light, but can't cure the common cold!"


So when and how do they cure it?




Answer



To be clear, Dr. Crusher never says they eradicated the common cold. In "The Battle", she says:



It may be true that headaches were once quite common, but this was in the days before the brain was charted, before we understood the nature of pain, when we were suffering from such things as the common cold.



But in "Datalore", Wesley Crusher and Data have the following exchange:



Wesley: Have you got a cold?
Data: A cold what?
Wesley: It's a disease my mother says people used to get.




Which does provide some circumstantial evidence that if it wasn't eradicated, it was certainly uncommon enough by the time Wesley was around to be something he knew nothing about except to parrot what his mother told him at one point.


While there is no canon specification for when the common cold was eradicated (or cured), one can formulate a conjecture based on circumstantial data like Wesley's recollection.


Here's the evidence in rough chronological order of what they describe:




  • As Memory Alpha notes, Dr. McCoy was still searching for a cure in the episode "Plato's Stepchildren".




  • Then, in "Ensign Ro", there's Picard's recollection of ginger tea being his "Aunt Rebecca's cure for the common cold."





  • Memory Alpha also refers to Tom Paris who, in the episode "Cathexis", tells the Doctor he had the common cold when he was nine years old.




  • Finally, there's Wesley's recollection in "Datalore" mentioned above




So, given these data points, I think it's safe to say the common cold was cured and/or eradicated in all but name sometime between the time Tom Paris was nine years old and when Wesley Crusher was born, or at least early childhood.


The year Tom Paris was age 9 is pretty tricky: his age is not mentioned in canon, so we don't really know. We could speculate that Tom Paris was the same age as his actor, Robert Duncan McNeill. Wikipedia says he was born in 1964, which would make him 30 years old when "Cathexis" aired.



Memory Alpha states that the events of that episode takes place in 2371, so if Tom Paris is the same age as McNeill, he would've been 9 in 2350.


Now, Memory Alpha states Wesley Crusher was born in 2348. It's unreferenced, but it's a good enough guess and likely comes from someone mentioning his age somewhere in the series, so I'd trust it.


Since Paris mentions having the cold after Wesley's birth year, it's hard to say when exactly it could've been eradicated. If there aren't any continuity errors, I'd wager it happened sometime between 2351 and 2353, which is when Wesley was 5 and likely would've already started to learn about the world in a substantial fashion from his mother.


But, on the other hand, it's likely there are continuity errors, and the writers didn't really expect to put too fine a point on it other than to trot it out any time they wanted to demonstrate how "advanced" Starfleet medical science was.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

What is Tolkien trying to say in this letter?

In a draft of a letter, later recorded as #246, Tolkien makes a strange statement. I am interested in the first few sentences of the letter, but I will include the remainder for the sake of context. In the 'Mirror of Galadriel', 1381, it appears that Galadriel conceived of herself as capable of wielding the Ring and supplanting the Dark Lord. If so, so also were the other guardians of the Three, especially Elrond . But this is another matter. It was part of the essential deceit of the Ring to fill minds with imaginations of supreme power . But this the Great had well considered and had rejected, as is seen in Elrond's words at the Council. Galadriel's rejection of the temptation was founded upon previous thought and resolve. In any case Elrond or Galadriel would have proceeded in the policy now adopted by Sauron: they would have built up an empire with great and absolutely subservient generals and armies and engines of war, until they could challenge Sauron and destroy ...

tolkiens legendarium - Was Galadriel's temptation of Boromir instrumental to his fall?

We know Galadriel tempted the members of the Fellowship, did she tempt Boromir with visions of taking the Ring and saving Gondor? In the books, Boromir willingly accepts the judgement of the council that the Ring should be destroyed, but after the meeting with Celeborn and Galadriel his personality seems to change. Was the temptation offered by Galadriel in some way responsible for Boromir's fall? Answer It's likely, but not certain I believe it is likely Galadriel tempted him with the ring, and in doing so re-ignited a pre-existing idea to take the ring, but to be clear lets break this down into three parts. Boromir at the Council of Elrond Boromir after setting off Boromir after being tempted Boromir at the Council of Elrond Boromir pleas for the ring to go to Minas Tirith, to help Gondor in its defense against Mordor. “ Why should we not think that the Great Ring has come into our hands to serve us in the very hour of need? Wielding it the Free Lords of the Free may surely...

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...