Skip to main content

When did they cure the common cold in Star Trek?


In the Next Generation, Beverly Crusher mentions the common cold has been eradicated. In Enterprise, Malcolm Reed gets the common cold, much to his consternation, for which he shouts something like "We can travel faster than the speed of light, but can't cure the common cold!"


So when and how do they cure it?




Answer



To be clear, Dr. Crusher never says they eradicated the common cold. In "The Battle", she says:



It may be true that headaches were once quite common, but this was in the days before the brain was charted, before we understood the nature of pain, when we were suffering from such things as the common cold.



But in "Datalore", Wesley Crusher and Data have the following exchange:



Wesley: Have you got a cold?
Data: A cold what?
Wesley: It's a disease my mother says people used to get.




Which does provide some circumstantial evidence that if it wasn't eradicated, it was certainly uncommon enough by the time Wesley was around to be something he knew nothing about except to parrot what his mother told him at one point.


While there is no canon specification for when the common cold was eradicated (or cured), one can formulate a conjecture based on circumstantial data like Wesley's recollection.


Here's the evidence in rough chronological order of what they describe:




  • As Memory Alpha notes, Dr. McCoy was still searching for a cure in the episode "Plato's Stepchildren".




  • Then, in "Ensign Ro", there's Picard's recollection of ginger tea being his "Aunt Rebecca's cure for the common cold."





  • Memory Alpha also refers to Tom Paris who, in the episode "Cathexis", tells the Doctor he had the common cold when he was nine years old.




  • Finally, there's Wesley's recollection in "Datalore" mentioned above




So, given these data points, I think it's safe to say the common cold was cured and/or eradicated in all but name sometime between the time Tom Paris was nine years old and when Wesley Crusher was born, or at least early childhood.


The year Tom Paris was age 9 is pretty tricky: his age is not mentioned in canon, so we don't really know. We could speculate that Tom Paris was the same age as his actor, Robert Duncan McNeill. Wikipedia says he was born in 1964, which would make him 30 years old when "Cathexis" aired.



Memory Alpha states that the events of that episode takes place in 2371, so if Tom Paris is the same age as McNeill, he would've been 9 in 2350.


Now, Memory Alpha states Wesley Crusher was born in 2348. It's unreferenced, but it's a good enough guess and likely comes from someone mentioning his age somewhere in the series, so I'd trust it.


Since Paris mentions having the cold after Wesley's birth year, it's hard to say when exactly it could've been eradicated. If there aren't any continuity errors, I'd wager it happened sometime between 2351 and 2353, which is when Wesley was 5 and likely would've already started to learn about the world in a substantial fashion from his mother.


But, on the other hand, it's likely there are continuity errors, and the writers didn't really expect to put too fine a point on it other than to trot it out any time they wanted to demonstrate how "advanced" Starfleet medical science was.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...