Skip to main content

the lord of the rings - What did Aragorn do with his sword between the battles of Pelennor Fields and Morannon?


After the Battle of the Pelennor Fields, Aragorn draws his sword Andúril and says:



"You shall not be sheathed again until the last battle is fought."

The Lord of the Rings, The Return of the King, Book V, Chapter 9: "The Last Debate"



The date is March 15; the "last battle" he has in mind is presumably the Battle of the Black Gate, which takes place ten days later, on March 25.


What did Aragorn do with Andúril for 10 days? He spent the first two days in his camp outside the gates of Minas Tirith, and the next seven days riding from Minas Tirith to the Black Gate.


We know from his dialogue outside Theoden's hall in Edoras that he is reluctant at best to lay the sword down, even in its sheath and under guard.



"It is not my will to put aside my sword, or to deliver Andúril to the hand of any other man".
-The Lord of the Rings, The Two Towers, Book III, Chapter 6: "The King of the Golden Hall"



He is eventually persuaded by Gandalf to comply with the guard's request to disarm, but only after delivering this warning:




"Here I set it, but I command you not to touch it, nor to permit any other to lay hand upon it. In this elvish sheath dwells the Blade that was Broken and has been made again. Telchar first wrought it in the deeps of time. Death shall come to any man that draws Elendil's sword save Elendil's heir."
-The Lord of the Rings, The Two Towers, Book III, Chapter 6: "The King of the Golden Hall"



In light of this, I can't imagine him leaving it unprotected in his tent. Did he walk around carrying an unsheathed sword for two days, then ride along carrying an unsheathed sword for a week? This seems like it would be dangerous, inconvenient, and fatiguing.


So how did he deal with an unsheathed, presumably razor sharp sword for a week and a half?




Note: here's why carrying an unsheathed sword around is a bad idea:



Aragorn stood before the Black Gate, fire in his eyes, Andúril held firmly in hand, shining forth from his hip. Pippin, alight with excitement, ran to his side, and cried, "Strider! Whither has the Dark Lo----". His voice suddenly ceased, for Aragorn, turning to face the halfling, smote his neck with an unintended blow; grimly he gazed upon the ruins of Pippin's throat, and with displeasure saw the hobbit's head tumble down the slag pile, spilling from its helm as it came to rest in the scree below.



A tear in his eye, Gandalf spoke: "Ever and anon, even the greatest of men may chance to visit such misfortune upon one whom he loves". Aragorn stood silent, watching until Pippin's headless body, which had remained upright through some unseen force of will, began at length to waver, and finally, fell in a heap at Aragorn's feet. At last he turned away, fixing his eyes upon the fair face of his fallen companion, saying "Alas, I did not wish this thing, Peregrin Took, Ernil i Pheriannath, Guardian of the Citadel, son of Paladin of the Shire. Truly, I tell thee, though I fear it be of no comfort now - My bad, dog".




Answer



He was speaking figuratively.


Obviously he didn't plan to keep his sword actually unsheathed, for reasons of safety on several different levels, for the many days it would obviously take until he reached the last battle.


I've wondered about this exact same thing (hey, I'm a pedant too!) and satisfied myself with the following version, which captures the spirit of Aragorn's words but could be intended literally:



"You shall not be sheathed again permanently, with no intention to unsheathe you afterwards, until the last battle is fought."
-- The Pedant of the Rings, The Return of the Pedant, Book V, Chapter 9: "The Last Pedant"




Edit: as Royal Canadian Bandit points out, the sword can be sheathed permanently if and only if there are no more battles, i.e. the last battle has been fought. So an even more rigorous phrasing would be:



"You shall not be sheathed again permanently, with no intention to unsheathe you in the foreseeable future, until the last battle of this ongoing war is fought."
-- The Pedant of the Pedants, The Pedant of the Pedant, Book V, Chapter 9: "The Pedant Pedant"



Edit: as Wad Cheber points out, there were later battles in the War of the Ring in which Aragorn did not fight (e.g. the Scouring of the Shire). So an even more more rigorous phrasing would be:



"You shall not be sheathed again permanently, with no intention to unsheathe you in the foreseeable future, until the last battle in which I shall participate in this ongoing war is fought."
-- The Pedant of the Pedants, The Pedant of the Pedant, Pedant V, Pedant 9: "The Pedant Pedant"




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...