Skip to main content

Why aren't we seeing 9th Doctor after he regenerated into the 10th?



We see past Doctors frequently in Doctor Who. The 10th Doctor has shown himself lots of times after being relived of his duties. Excluding The Day of The Doctor, we've also seen the 5th Doctor (Peter Davison), the 8th Doctor (Paul McGann) and the 11th Doctor (Matt Smith) after they were out of service.


Why doesn't the 9th Doctor (Christopher Eccleston) show up? I am asking from out-of-universe perspective of course.



Answer



For Day of the Doctor specifically, Eccleston was asked to return and ultimately decided to decline. In an interview with SFX magazine, quoted by GiantFreakinRobot.com, Moffat said:



’I had an initial contact with Chris and, in a very amiable and gentlemanly way, he didn’t feel that he could come back to it,’ he says. Moffat continues, ‘There wasn’t any big fuss about it — I had a couple of meetings with him, and he was perfectly pleasant, and indeed quite enthused about the show, but he just doesn’t do that, it’s just not him.'



In general, it's hard to say. Eccleston did not leave the show on good terms, according to the Bad Wilf podcast:



“I left Doctor Who because I could not get along with the senior people. I left because of politics. I did not see eye-to-eye with them. I didn’t agree with the way things were being run. I didn’t like the culture that had grown up around the series. So I left, I felt, over a principle."




Eccleston's been very tight-lipped about his departure in general, so it's hard to say which "senior people" he's talking about, but bad blood is as likely a factor as anything else.


Moffat's comment in my first quote seems to indicate that Eccleston doesn't like to go go back to projects once he's moved on from them, which is another plausible explanation.


That possibility is given credence by Eccleston himself, who, when asked if he'd be returning for Day of the Doctor, reportedly said:



"No, never bathe in the same river twice."



Omegacron raises an interesting point in comments: why not just CGI Eccleston's face into the show, since the BBC owns the rights to the Ninth Doctor's appearance?


For one thing, they sort of did. The last scene of Day of the Doctor, pictured below, features the likenesses of all previous Doctors including both John Hurt and Christopher Eccleston:


The Twelve Doctors



And of course he appeared in archive footage during the big "All the Doctors fly in to save Gallifrey" scene.


Moffat commented on this in Doctor Who Magazine, as well as the decision to not show John Hurt regenerating into Eccleston, as BBC America reports:



“It was one thing to include [him] among all the other archive Doctors, as they flew in to save the day,” he explained, “in fact, it would have been disgraceful to have left anyone out – but placing him in that [regeneration] scene might have given the impression he’d actually turned up for filming, which would have been crossing the line.”


He added: “not taking part in the 50th was a difficult decision for Chris, taken after a lot of thought and with great courtesy, and not respecting his wishes would have been grossly unprofessional and disrespectful to a good man and a great Doctor.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...