Skip to main content

How did Harry, Ron and Hermione buy presents for each other?


I have been re-reading the Harry Potter books again and I noticed that Harry, Ron and Hermione have been giving each other Christmas presents each year at Hogwarts. How have they been able to buy each other presents if they are not allowed to go out of Hogwarts?


From their third year on they could visit the village and buy presents there, but what about the first two years? Did they give their personal belongings? Or did they just happen to have boxes of chocolates or books to give each other?



Answer





Let's look at the presents which are given and received by the trio in the first two books.


Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone:
- A wooden flute, given to Harry by Hagrid.
- A jumper and some fudge, given to both Ron and Harry by Mrs Weasley.
- A large box of Chocolate Frogs, given to Harry by Hermione.
- A box of Every-Flavour Beans, given to Ron by Hermione.
- James Potter's Invisibility Cloak, given to Harry by Dumbledore.


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets:
- A large tin of treacle fudge, given to Harry by Hagrid.

- A copy of Flying with the Cannons (a book), given to Harry by Ron.
- A luxury eagle-feather quill, given to Harry by Hermione.
- A knitted jumper and a large plum cake, given to Harry by Mrs Weasley.


I've ignored the non-gifts from the Dursleys, which I think shouldn't really count.


From this list we can see that quite a few of the gifts are homemade.



It was wrapped in thick brown paper and scrawled across it was To Harry, from Hagrid. Inside was a roughly cut wooden flute. Hagrid had obviously whittled it himself.
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 12, The Mirror of Erised).


Harry had torn open the parcel to find a thick, hand-knitted sweater in emerald green and a large box of homemade fudge.
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 12, The Mirror of Erised).




However, the homemade nature of some of the gifts certainly shouldn't imply that they were made because commercial alternatives weren't available. Hagrid and Mrs Weasley were more than capable of going to wizarding shops if they'd wanted to. They simply preferred the personal charm of homemade gifts.


As for the children, it's true to say that they couldn't have got the presents from Hogsmeade, since first- and second-years weren't permitted to go. It's highly unlikely though that they only gave unwanted items that they just happened to have lying around. The only possible exception is Flying with the Canons, which might conceivably be a second-hand book once owned by Ron. He doesn't come from a wealthy family, after all, so he probably didn't have a great deal of money available for presents. We also don't have a record of Ron buying Harry a present in year one, which again could imply limited means. It's possible that, knowing Harry's keen interest in Quidditch, Ron decided to give him one of his old books.


However, Hermione's presents were almost certainly shop-bought. It's unlikely that she would give Harry a second-hand quill. Additionally, Chocolate Frogs and Bertie Bott's Every Flavour Beans were commercially branded confectionary products. These weren't homemade imitations but mass-distributed household names. They had to be shop-bought by definition.


How could they get hold of the presents? I can think of a few options:



  • The gifts were obtained in Hogsmeade and the trio simply asked older children (who had permisson to go) to buy the presents on their behalf.

  • The kids bought the presents in Diagon Alley at the start of the year in the knowledge that shopping trips during termtime would be few and far between.

  • As Mike. C. Ford suggests, Hermione could've bought her gifts from the first year in person in Diagon Alley and sent them on by owl (since she wasn't at Hogwarts for Christmas that year).

  • The presents were ordered from Hogwarts by mail order. It's likely that businesses from both Hogsmeade and Diagon Alley would've operated an owl order system for remote customers, along the lines of Fred and George's operation. Hogwarts students would be able to avail themselves of this.


    "Fred and George are driving Muriel up the wall, they're still operating an Owl Order business out of her back room."
    (Deathly Hallows, Chapter 25, Shell Cottage).





It's highly unlikely that the presents were bought at Hogwarts. Valorum has found a good prop from one of the movies which suggests that there was, in movie canon, a tuck shop where students could buy some snacks. However, this shop doesn't appear in the books at all. Whenever students need to buy something, in both the books and the movies, they use Diagon Alley or Hogsmeade. For example, when Harry and Ron need to buy copies of Advanced Potion-Making for Potions midway through the school year they didn't use a school shop but sent away for copies to be delivered by owl from Flourish and Blotts. There's no precedent for any student buying things at Hogwarts (except on the black market). I think we can rule out Hogwarts as a source for the presents.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...