Skip to main content

star trek - How could Bashir (and Sisko) believe that mutants are correct?


In the Deep Space Nine episode Statistical Probabilities, Bashir works with a group of genetically engineered humans. At some point they all come to the conclusion that




it is 100% sure that Federation will loose the war against the Dominion.



Bashir and the other mutants are so extremely certain that their calculations are correct, that they're willing to risk a lot to prevent this vision from ever happening.


I can understand the other team members, but how could Bashir (and then Sisko) possibly even think that mutants are correct? In Sacrifice of Angels, they were both aboard the Defiant and they saw in the final scene, that



the Prophets can change history with a "snap of their fingers." If they can erase an entire Dominion fleet within a matter of seconds, then it must be obvious to anyone that an entity with such power can do anything they wanted; and that there is absolutely nothing that can be 100% certain in a war theatre, in which this entity is involved.



In other words, if Prophets managed to do what they did in Sacrifice of Angels, then what could prevent them from making Bashir's team "100% certain conclusions" not happen at all?


I like Statistical Probabilities very much, and even find it one of the best episodes in Deep Space Nine; but I'm pretty sure that -- given the above -- their "100% certain conclusions" is based on a completely false assumption.


Can someone confirm that I'm correct, or (if I'm not) can someone tell me where/how I'm wrong?




Answer



Sisko


First off, it's worth pointing out that Sisko certainly doesn't accept the group's conclusions that the Federation will lose the war. He finds their work distinctly lacking, largely because they've made assumptions when calculating their probabilities, and that without perfect knowledge of the enemy's disposition, plans and motives, it's impossible to know with total certainty the likely outcome of the conflict.



SISKO: I don't accept it. Your entire argument is based on a series of statistical probabilities and assumptions.



Sisko is very much of the opinion that even faced with insurmountable odds, that freedom is something worth fighting for and hence that their conclusions, no matter how well argued, are basically worthless to him.



SISKO: (emotion rising) Even if I knew what was going to happen with one hundred percent certainty, I still wouldn't ask an entire generation of people to give up their freedom.




Bashir


As a Doctor, Bashir's sensibilities are very heavily aligned with the idea of saving as many lives as possible. As a "mutant" himself he's extremely enamoured of the group's abilities and has a strong emotional investment in proving them right and by extension, proving their (and his own) worth to society.



SISKO: Hang on a minute. How did you come up with all this? Two days ago you said these people were impossible to deal with, now they're turning out projections that would take Starfleet Intelligence months to come up with.


Bashir smiles, shrugs --


BASHIR: We're mutants.



Because of his emotional attachment, he seems willing to overlook the fundamental irrationality of his own argument...



BASHIR: Thank you, sir. (showing him a PADD) The way the statistical model we're using works, the farther into the future we go, the more accurate the projection.




... which neglects (indeed disregards) the fact that small actions can have large consequences and that god-like aliens can turn up at any time.



BASHIR: I understand how you feel, sir. I don't like it any more than you do. But it's the best option. We ran dozens of different scenarios. Even if something unlikely were to happen that tilted the scales in our favor -- say an anti-Dominion coup on Cardassia -- we'd still lose this war.





In short, both parties are allowing their emotions to cloud their judgment. Sisko is unwilling to even consider surrendering to the Dominion and Bashir is so desperate to prove the Mutants worth that he's willing to overlook the shortcomings of their analysis.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...