Skip to main content

dc - Why did Jonathan and Martha Kent attach a Cape to Superman's costume?


Due to baby Kal-El's super powers, Earth clothes didn't last long on him. So, Martha Kent used Kryptonian blankets to make a costume for him. If you can see the second image of the attached answer, the baby costume also had a cape (not just the original Superman costume).


So, I can assume that it was either Jonathan Kent's or Martha Kent's idea. Why did Jonathan and Martha Kent (who weren't good at physics, I think) attach a cape to the costume? What was its purpose?




Answer



Superman's costume (and those of the other Golden Age superheroes) were inspired by the circus performers of the day which sometimes included a cape. When Siegel and Shuster designed the costume the added the cape and the look became so iconic no-one ever removed it from the design but this you probably know.


Within the context of the story the reason Martha Kent added the cape was simply because it looked good when he flew. I don't have a concrete example of a time she did this in the comics but if you watch the pilot episode of Lois and Clark you'll see what I mean.


Before Crisis on Infinite Earths Superman's costume had been made out of indestructible baby blankets from Krypton (I assume there was a high infant mortality rate on their planet) which Martha was somehow able to cut and stitch with Earth instruments. But in the updated version of Superman's origin that followed it was revealed that Superman's body creates an "electromagnetic aura" about half an inch from the surface of his skin. Not only does this aura protect him but it also protects all clothing that falls within it and even prevents them from getting dirty, thus this became the new in continuity reason for why Superman wears tights but there was no reason he'd have a cape as it fell outside the aura and would get damaged easily and Superman needed Martha Kent to make large numbers of replacement capes. So the writers explained the reason he had a cape was because it had a pouch for his Clark Kent clothes, even though there was no protection and it would have probably been a better to leave them in a bag of some sort the way Peter Parker does. The cape with a pouch was actually an idea that itself had been introduced sometime in the 1950s.


In later years the origin was updated again and in the new version Martha had seen holograms of people from Krypton wearing capes and decided to make Clark a Kryptonian set of clothes as it was part of his heritage and for this she added the cape.


In the New 52 it turns out that Superman's costume is a Kryptonian ceremonial armour that Superman stole from Brainiac who himself stole it from Krypton possibly from Jor-El as he's seen wearing it. The suit adapts to whoever wears it and can change colour, before Superman wore it it was white with a circle on the chest and when he wore it and time travelled into the past of Krypton it changed to green with a planet logo on his chest. The suit can even shrink to just the logo so Superman can carry it around during the summer. But the cape was apparently a baby blanket or piece of cloth that Jor-El and Lara sent with baby Kal-El to Earth which Superman has a hard time parting with for some reason and even wore it with his early costume which was just a t-shirt and a pair of jeans! The cape is now like a security blanket which makes Superman like Linus from the Peanuts comics!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...