Skip to main content

harry potter - How many Death Eaters died before Voldemort lost power the first time?


In the scene in Voldemort's father's graveyard, it is implied that all the Death Eaters there ever were (with Dark Marks) have a place in the circle, and it is further implied that only 3 died while working for Voldemort.


Can reasonable guesses be made as to who those three were, and is it really possible that there were no other losses by the Death Eaters?



Answer



The exact passage you’re thinking of is as follows (GoF, chapter 33):



“And here we have six missing Death Eaters… three dead in my service. One, too cowardly to return… he will pay. One, who I believe has left me forever... he will be killed, of course… and one, who remains my most faithful servant, and who has already reentered my service.”




As with the answer to a similar question, I’d assume that these people are part of Voldemort’s “inner circle”, and not representative of his entire force. Voldemort doesn’t strike me as the sort of person who’d mourn or mention their loss. I think the losses were far greater than three, but most wouldn’t merit any mention at Voldemort’s rebirthing ceremony.


So, who are these three people? I checked lists of named Death Eaters on HP Wikia, Lexicon, and so on for plausible candidates, and there are only really these three.


Here are my guesses:


Evan Rosier


We get his name in Karkaroff’s trial (GoF, chapter 30):



“Why, yes... there was Rosier,” said Karkaroff hurriedly. “Evan Rosier.”


“Rosier is dead,” said Crouch. “He was caught shortly after you were too. He preferred to fight rather than come quietly and was killed in the struggle.”


“Took a bit of me with him, though,” whispered Moody to Harry’s right. Harry looked around at him once more, and saw him indicating the large chunk out of his nose to Dumbledore.




Why do I think he’s important?



  • Karkaroff thought his name would be of value to the Ministry.

  • He was dispatched by Moody, probably the “best Auror the Ministry ever had” (Sirius). This suggests that he was a high-profile (and highly skilled) target.

  • Chose to die rather than being arrested, which suggests dedication to his cause and the possibility that he had secret information he wanted to keep out of the Order/Ministry’s hands. Both suggestive of high rank. We also know that Moody “always brought people in alive where possible”, so he wasn’t killed idly.


He died before the end of the war, so Voldemort would have known of his death. Quoting Sirius again (GoF, chapter 27):



“Rosier and Wilkes – they were both killed by Aurors the year before Voldemort fell.”




This is when Sirius is discussing Snape’s old gang, and their future careers as Death Eaters.


Wilkes?


All we have to go on is the line from Sirius above. We know he was a Slytherin, student at Hogwarts, in a group with other prominent Death Eaters (inc. Avery, the Lestranges and Snape). Lacking better guesses, this seems like a good guess for the second.


Regulus Black?


This is more of a wildcard, but hear me out. Here are some arguments in favour:



  • He was a pure-blood wizard from a respected family, with close relations to many other pure-blood Death Eaters and their families. This is prime Death Eater material, and likely to ingratiate him with the inner circle. (It may also be why he got cold feet, if he was quickly placed alongside the more ruthless Death Eaters and saw Voldemort in person.)

  • He was close enough to Voldemort to find out about the horcruxes. At least in part because he volunteered Kreacher to help place the locket in the basin, which suggests he was trusted by Voldemort. He also knew how to get Kreacher out from the cave, and used Kreacher’s knowledge to retrieve the original horcrux. This suggests cunning and intelligence, which would have been valuable skills as a Death Eater.

  • The note he leaves is signed “R.A.B.”, rather than his full name. If he expected Voldemort to recognise this, he was probably of some importance.

  • Finally, we know he died in the cave replacing the horcruxes, and kept the circumstances of his death a secret to keep the family safe. Since Voldemort never returned to inspect the locket, he would never have learnt of Regulus’s defection. In this case, it seems logical to assume he died loyal to Voldemort and during his service.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...