Skip to main content

tolkiens legendarium - Was The Hobbit meant to be an adaptation of There and Back Again by Bilbo?


I know that The Hobbit was written before LOTR and retconned to be part of the legendarium in the second edition. I also understand it was to some extent a children's book. Both of these explain the stylistic differences between it and LOTR.


Another possible (albeit fictional) explanation of this is that The Hobbit is an adaptation of Bilbo's book, There and Back Again - in which case the style would be expected to differ from LOTR. For example, the discrepancy between calling what are apparently the same creature Goblins in The Hobbit and Orcs in LOTR can be explained in terms of Bilbo's understanding of what these creatures are called.


Can anyone say anything about whether The Hobbit was intended to be understood this way?



Answer



The Hobbit was not an adaptation, but a translation.


Tolkien envisioned himself as a translator of ancient manuscripts that had made their way into his hands. The Red Book of Westmarch, in which Frodo had compiled Bilbo's notes and consisted of There and Back Again and The Downfall of the Lord of the Rings and the Return of the King, amongst other works. Tolkien had acquired these works and translated them into Old English, and then further into Modern English (as outlined in this comment).



While never explicitly stated by the Professor himself, it is implicit in the way many of the sections of the Lord of the Rings (LR) outside the story were written. One example is the Prologue, written in the style of a modern editor describing a time long past. Other examples exist in an introductory note to the revised edition of the Hobbit (TH), the Preface to The Adventures of Tom Bombadil, and Appendixes A, D and F, especially the note on Shire records, which invents a manuscript tradition (that the original Red Book had not survived but a copy had).


As for the stylistic difference, this from an out-of-universe perspective is because of the later addition of TH to the Legendarium when Allan & Unwin had asked for a sequel (LR), and it is worth noting that Book 1 (the first half of the Fellowship of the Ring) is stylistically closer to TH than the rest of LR, which Tolkien claims to be intentional. In-universe according to the translator theory, the stylistic change would not have been because of an adaptation but because TH was penned by Bilbo Baggins, while LR was written by Frodo, after the War of the Ring. Book 1, could therefore be stylistically closer to TH because Frodo would've been able to tell Bilbo about his adventure thus far up to their meeting in Rivendell:



What about helping me with my book, and making a start on the next?




Then Bilbo would read passages from his book (which still seemed very incomplete). or scraps of his verses, or would take notes of Frodo's adventures.
Fellowship of the Ring - Book II, Chapter 2: Council of Elrond



Given that Bilbo had most of his own tale to write about during the War of the Ring, as well as the possibility of beginning on LR, this would explain the similarity in style between Book 1 and TH, and the sudden change in the rest of LR.



Below is a plot of the Transmission of the Legends in The Chronicles of Arda by Måns Björkman


Key:


" " = Important Work,        * * = Author  
( ) = Translations, _ _ = Regions
> = Direction of flow

*Quennar i Onótimo*
"Of the Beginning of Time..."
"Yénonótië"
"The Tale of Years"

*Rúmil* | "Parma Culuina"
"Annals of Aman"---<---| _Doriath_ |
"Ambarcanta" | "The Grey Annals" |
"Ainulindalë" | | |
| | | *Pengolodh* | *Dírhaval*
|--------->-----+----->----"Quenta Silmarillion"--<--"Narn i Chîn Húrin"
| "Lammas"
| |
|----------------<-------------------+
|

|------------>--------+--------->--------+
| | |
| _Númenor_ _Rivendell_
| "Indis i·Ciryamo" "Books of Lore"
| | |
| | |
| _Arnor and Gondor_ |
| | | *Bilbo Baggins*
| "Book of the Kings" | "My Diary"
| "Book of the Stewards" +-("Translations from the Elvish")

| "Akallabêth" |
"Quentalë | *Torhir Ifant* | *Frodo Baggins* |
Ardanómion" | "Dorgannas Iaur" | *Sam Gamgee* |
| | | |----->----"The Lord of the Rings" |
| | | | | |
| | | | "The Red Book of Westmarch"
| | | | *Findegil* |
| | | |-->--"The Thain's Book"------<------|
| | | | | [Many copies] _The Shire_
| *Ælfwine* | | | | "The Tale of Years"

("Quenta Silmarillion") | +----------->----------| |
("Annals of Aman") | | |
("Grey Annals") | | |
| | | |
+-------->------------|-------------------<----------------+-------<-------+
|
*J. R. R. Tolkien*
("The Hobbit")
("The Lord of the Rings")
("The Silmarillion")

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...