Skip to main content

star trek - How many times did Picard violate the prime directive on-screen?


The Prime Directive is Starfleet's general order number one regarding contact with new forms of life - as a rule, captains are not supposed to violate it, yet often they're forced into situations where they do.


As a result, when Captain Picard was brought to trial on drummed-up charges, he was accused of violating the prime directive a total of 9 times.



SATIE: Would it surprise you to learn that you have violated the Prime Directive a total of nine times since you took command of the Enterprise? I must say, Captain, it surprised the hell out of me.




Episode Transcript - 'The Drumhead'


I can think of at least two instances where Picard violated the prime directive on-screen. One was in Who Watches the Watchers where he accidentally became a godlike being to a primitive race, and another in First Contact (Not the movie) where it was Riker who was found out, and forced Picard to make contact with the new civilization prematurely.


Were there in fact seven other on-screen instances of Picard violating the prime directive before this episode? Or are we meant to assume a number of them happened off-screen?



Answer



The Memory Alpha page on the Prime Directive lists several examples of Picard violating the Prime Directive. Note that for this answer, the Prime Directive will be interpreted in its most absolute form i.e. there being no exceptions to it - pre-warp civilizations must not be contacted.



  • 'Pen Pals': Picard declared that the distress message from Drema IV was sufficient grounds for an exception to the Prime Directive. Despite the precautionary measures taken, this still does count as a violation.

  • Nemesis: when investigating positronic signatures, the pre-warp civilization of Kolarus III were exposed to Federation technology and Federation personnel, thereby culturally contaminating them.


Arguably:




  • 'Who Watches the Watchers': the Enterprise-D was involved in the cultural contamination of the proto-Vulcan society. It wasn't Picard's fault that the holographic projector failed, but subsequent efforts to minimise cultural contamination didn't help matters, so it could be said here that Picard violated an absolute interpretation of the Prime Directive

  • 'Homeward': Transportation of the pre-warp society of Boraal II. Again, this wasn't technically Picard's fault, but his decision to resettle the society elsewhere could also be seen as violation of the Prime Directive.

  • 'Justice': Picard's interference in the justice system of the Edo society of Rubicun III


So that's five times we see it on screen, but several of these, notably Nemesis and 'Homeward' hadn't even occurred prior to 'Drumhead'.


The article which @Richard refers to lists several other possibilities:



Debatable:





  • "Angel One": The away team, ultimately Picard's responsibility, gets pretty close to the line of interfering with the society of Angel I by encouraging its more egalitarian elements.




  • "Symbiosis": Picard withholds basic assistance from a pair of space faring races to break a cycle of addiction. His unconventional inaction could be seen as a form of interference.




  • "The Hunted": Similar to "Symbiosis", the presence of the Enterprise facilitates certain events (the escape and recapture of Roga Danar) that Picard later deliberately interrupts to be nominally "non-interfering" but in actuality to achieve the result he desires (change in the Angosian government).





  • "The High Ground": Picard and the Enterprise crew become more entangled than they intended in the Rutian civil war.




  • "Devil's Due": While "Ardra" was a phony, Picard could be considered to have over-involved himself in the "spiritual" evolution of the Ventaxians by challenging her authority.




  • "First Contact": When does a fouled up first contact situation become cultural interference?




Stretching it:





  • "Code of Honor": When your security chief ends up in a fight to the death with the mate of the leader of an alien world, it doesn't look good on the report.




  • "Reunion": Arbitrating the future leadership of the Klingon Empire is not exactly Starfleet's idea of a captain's role.




  • "Transfigurations": An even more incidental effect of the Enterprise going about its normal business, yet still playing a part in massive societal change.






So, if you were to accept all of these (and quite frankly even I don't accept all of these), it would amount to 14 times on screen we see Picard violating the Prime Directive.


Regarding what is said in 'The Drumhead', of the above cases, 'Pen Pals', 'Who Watches the Watchers', 'Justice', 'Angel One', 'Symbiosis', 'The Hunted', 'The High Ground', 'Devil's Due', 'First Contact', 'Code of Honor', 'Reunion' and 'Transfigurations' are all set prior to 'The Drumhead', making 12 possible violations of the Prime Directive shown on screen prior to 'The Drumhead'. Hence, assuming the only violations of the Prime Directive occurred on screen, then three of those 12 must not be considered violations by Starfleet.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more