Skip to main content

Which Harry Potter works are considered canon?


There are many different Harry Potter works including:




  • books

  • short stories

  • movies

  • card games

  • video games

  • toys

  • amusement parks

  • web content



Which ones are considered to be canon?



Answer



As Stu Wilson said, there's no "official corporate position" of JKR on the topic; so the exact hierarchy of canonicity is somewhat subjective and personal.


Having said that, I would like to offer what my personal preference is, together with objective explanation of why that order was chosen. (For other commonly accepted opinions, see @ibid's answer)




  1. Pottermore.




    • This is more canonical than interviews for 3 reasons:



      A. Interviews are spur of the moment things where JKR may say something off the cuff. She made mistakes in interviews before. Pottermore is "official" content she spents time to think through.


      B. Much of Pottermore content is much newer than a vast bulk of JKR interviews.


      C. JKR officially noted in 2012 that Pottermore is currently a replacement for her originally-planned HP Encyclopedia.




    • Pottermore is also more canonical than books for the reasons B and C above.




    • Note: This only applies to Pottermore content by JKR. Pottermore content NOT known to be by JKR slides down to same level as films.







  2. Original JKRowling.com website.


    I view it as Pottermore-lite, except that it was much earlier AND wasn't billed as "official encyclopedia stand-in".


    This also includes things like W.O.M.B.A.T.S. and various "gazette" type promotional materials that were at some point posted by JKR.




  3. JKR interviews where JKR clearly announced that the book is wrong (or where there's no discrepancies with the books).


    This includes things like "No, Harry wasn't a Horcrux, no matter what Dumbledore said in DH".





  4. JKR interviews and Wonderbook content where JKR contradicted the books but didn't actually acknowledge that the book was wrong (and the book was earlier than interview)


    But in case of conflict between books and interviews; I view the situation as more of "needs deeper digging" than easy and obvious "book is wrong" kind of dilemmas.


    Note: Wonderbook content not 100% known to come from JKR slides down to just above the films.




  5. HP books 1-7


    Also on this level will be the Fantastic Beasts screenplay if it is proven conclusively to be 100% in JKR's control.





  6. Supplemental JKR books (Beedle the Bard, QTTA, HP Prequel story about the bicycle, Fantastic Beasts, Daily Prophet, Wonderbook content)


    I don't have a very good reason to view main HP books as more canonical than supplementary books; so I can easily agree if someone insists on switching them in the hierarchy. As we know from this excellent asnwer, there are some discrepancies so the order may mattter.


    Also on this level is the Famous Wizard Cards from the EA games which have been confirmed to be written by JKR.




  7. Harry Potter and the Cursed Child by Jack Thorne


    This has been marketed as "The Eighth Story", but wasn't written by Rowling.





  8. JKR interviews where JKR contradicted them in later books




  9. Wonderbook content which is NOT 100% known to come from JKR




  10. Fantastic Beasts Film where not proven to be from JKR screenplay


    Higher up than the other movies as JKR exercised greater creative control.





  11. HP Movies 1-8


    Personally, I don't really consider movies canon almost at all. BUT, they are marginally canonical in a sense that JKR did approve a lot of things in the movies and had feedback into them. Some people consider them to be almost as canonical as books. I consider them significantly LESS canonical.


    CAVEAT: The only case where a movie is full canon is when it's a details that's KNOWN to be approved by JKR explicitly.




  12. Facts sourced from Harry Potter amusement parks and Video Games


    This is even less canon than movies but probably a shade above fanfics if there's a reasonable suspicion JKR approved of a specific fact.




  13. Assorted fan fiction



    This is NOT canon at all as JKR didn't approve any of it.




High level, my hierarchy is:



  1. 100% sure JKR word that is planned writing, acknowledging discrepancies with prior canon (e.g. Pottermore content by JKR, jkrowling.com). Pottermore is higher within this subgroup due to being considered an official replacement for encyclopedia

  2. 100% sure JKR word that is ad-hoc (interviews/twitter), acknowledging discrepancies with prior canon

  3. JKR word where there are NO discrepancies, or they aren't acknowledged, and is planned writing

  4. JKR word where there are NO discrepancies, or they aren't acknowledged, and is ad-hoc

  5. Books 1-7


  6. Supplemental books + any material 100% authored by JKR if proven so (screenplays)

  7. JKR's prior word, contradicted by LATER info in #1-6

  8. Info from works that are under some level of creative control of JKR, but not proven to actually come from her fact-wise (movies #1-8; FB movie; Cursed Child). Within this, ordered by the degree of JKR control, e.g. #1-#8 are lower since she exercised less control.

  9. Tertiary works (Video games, Parks)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more