Skip to main content

What is the chronological order for the Star Trek series?


A while back, my dad got a couple volumes of Star Trek Voyager. Out of the entire series he's only seen some of Next Generation and the Star Trek: First Contact, so he never knew about Voyager. During his holiday break he walked into my room while I was on the computer, he does this on occasion when he passes my room, after having to explain why Sono Hanabira has only girls kissing girls he noticed that on my TV, Star Trek Deep Space 9 was on (it had been on for the entire time).


He said he hasn't "seen these Voyager episodes before" so i had to correct him. He then asked me when it occurs in relevance to Star Trek Voyager. Since I'm not entirely into Star Trek and I only had the TV on as ambiance for my room, I couldn't answer. I know now that now he knows of yet another Star Trek series, he'll be wanting me to find sources for him to buy DVDs/VHSs from.


Because he'd rather watch a series or franchise in its chronological order, I think it would be better if I started sourcing the DVDs/VHSs chronologically. However, since I'm not entirely into the series i have no idea the chronological order for the entire franchise apart from that Star Trek (2009) is a new continuity and Into Darkness follows after it.


So I am wondering, what is the chronological order for the Star Trek franchise. I am mainly just looking at the Movies and TV Series.



Answer




Notes:




  • Because of the (over)abundance of time travel in the franchise, the "chronological" order is actually completely jumbled up. E.g. some episodes/movies are set in far future or far past for a part or nearly entirety of the episode. I will be omitting those from the first part of the answer..




  • The question is very extensively answered in a very good Wikipedia article - the answer below is merely a useful distillation.




Trek Timeline




In large strokes:




  1. 2151 to 2155: Star Trek: Enterprise (ST:ENT)


    Finale is set in 2161.




  2. 2233 to 2258: 2009 Star Trek reboot film (Alternate universe)





  3. 2259 to 2260: Star Trek Into the Darkness (Alternate universe)




  4. 2254 to 2269: Star Trek: The Original Series (ST: TOS).


    Individual per-season in universe years can be found on the Wiki




  5. 2269 to 2270: Star Trek: Animated Series (ST: TAS)





  6. 2273 to 2273: Star Trek the Motion Picture




  7. 2285 to 2293 Star Trek movies #2-6


    The Wrath of Khan, The Search for Spock, The Voyage Home, The Final Frontier, The Undiscovered Country; in that order.


    In-universe years on the Wiki.




  8. 2293 to 2371: Star Trek: Generations starts



    Movie prologue is before ST: TNG starts; the end of the movie happens after ST: TNG ends.




  9. 2364 to 2370: Star Trek: The Next Generation (ST:TNG)




  10. 2371 to 2371: Star Trek: Generations (bulk of the movie except prologue)




  11. 2373 to 2373: First Contact





  12. 2375 to 2375: Insurrection




  13. 2369 to 2375: Star Trek: Deep Space 9 (ST: DS9)



    • Partially overlaps with TNG, Generations and 2 TNG movies

    • Season 1 is same time as TNG season 6

    • Season 3 follows the end of TNG





  14. 2371 to 2378: ST: Voyager



    • Partially overlaps with DS9, Generations and 2 TNG movies.

    • Season 1 starts the year after TNG ends and same year as DS9 season 3

    • Season 5 follows the end of DS9.





  15. 2379 to 2379: Nemesis




  16. 2387 to 2387: 2009 ST reboot - before time travel backwards to 2233.





Individual episodes, as mentioned above, featured time travel to vaious past and future dates. Full list on the Wiki, but some random ones:




  • 3.5 Billion years ago (TNG)

  • 2840 BC (TOS)

  • 1893 (TNG)

  • 1930 (TOS)

  • 1986: Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home

  • 2063: First Contact Cochrane timeline.

  • 31st Century (ENT)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more