Skip to main content

star trek - Why were DS9's uniforms different?


For DS9, they switched to the much less pajamic uniform style.





TNG style: colorful body, collar, black shoulders, no undershirt.



whereas




DS9 style: black body, colored shoulders, grayish undershirt.



Those uniforms were used in Voyager.


Eventually, everyone converts to this:





black body, gray shoulders, colored undershirt



Now, in the first DS9 episode, Sisko, O'Brien, Dax and Bashir are all shown in the TNG style uniform before they settle on DS9 and have chance to change uniforms.


So was the intent that they wear the less formal uniforms on DS9 because -- why -- because it's not a ship? because it's the frontier? because it's not Federation space?


This is confounded since they then go with the new uniforms for Voyager as well as the Enterprise-D in Star Trek: Generations, which seems to be as odds with the DS9/TNG schism.


So what exactly was supposed to be going on in-universe at the time with the uniforms?



Answer





I believe answer has to do with formality versus informality and comfort.


As far as four seasons into DS9, we see the TNG-style duty uniforms still being used. They appear in the episode "Homefront". When Sisko returns to Earth to meet Admiral Leyton, Admiral Leyton wears the TNG-style admiral's uniform and his aide wears the TNG-style duty uniform:


enter image description here


In the background we can see other officers in the TNG-style uniform. In particular, Sisko changes back into a TNG-style uniform for his meeting with Leyton.


We have already ruled out that the DS9-style jumpsuits were intended for use exclusively on space stations, given that they are used on the Enterprise-D in Generations and on Voyager. Since officers based at Starfleet Command are still wearing the older uniforms in the fourth season of DS9, and since Sisko made the point of changing into them for his visit to Starfleet Command, the suggestion is that the TNG-era uniforms are more formal.


In turn, this suggests that officers on starships and Starfleet installations were offered the jumpsuit as an alternative to the TNG-era uniforms, perhaps for comfort while working. Consistent with this, the "Homefront" example shows that the jumpsuits might not be deemed as suitable for official business as the TNG-era uniforms.


So in the years leading up to the fleet-wide shift to the grey-topped First Contact-period uniforms, the TNG and the DS9-style uniforms were in use concurrently, with context dictating which was more appropriate.


This screenshot from the Enterprise bridge in Generations shows both in use at the same time:


enter image description here


Most telling is that Riker begins the film in a TNG-style uniform, but when things begin to heat up, he changes into a DS9 jumpsuit. Comfort is important when you're about the crash the saucer section into a planet!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...