Skip to main content

pokemon - Are Pokémon animals?


Let's get technical here. Have you ever seen Pikachu excrete? What about Charizard? Or Greninja? No! Well, I don't think anyone has. Is that a sign of them not being actual animals? Let's recall the seven vital characteristics for life: Mrs. Gren.




  • Movement

  • Respiratory

  • Sensitivity

  • Growth

  • Reproduction

  • Excretion

  • Nutrition


We've seen Pikachu move (obviously), breathe, touch, and eat.



Does Pikachu grow? Does he excrete?


I am missing one thing out here: reproduction. But we all know Pokémon reproduce, if not by normal means.


Throughout the series, we haven't seen Pikachu grow at all, or other Pokémon. Does evolving count?


We've never seen a Pokémon excrete.


Therefore, can we say they are animals?


Let me make it clear that this is only out of interest, and I have not gone basukas!



Answer



This question has been the topic for great discussion; in providing research for my answer, I even found a fair few discussion posts on Reddit, though I can not seem to find them, now.; however there is evidence of regular animals existing in the Pokémon universe, where the lack there of appears to be the most popular argument for Pokémon being animals.


At the end of the day, Pokémon are monsters; after all, Pokémon is a portmanteau of "pocket" and "monster". Some of them are based off animals, and thus act like and can fill the roles of particular animals; others are based off plants, or even inanimate objects. Whether they are actually considered animals is an entirely different story, and there is not enough conclusive evidence.





This question appears to correlate the MRS GREN acronymn with being an animal. In actual fact, the MRS GREN acronymn does not specifically identify an animal; it identifies a living organism. We can say without doubt that they are living organisms. Let's take a closer look at the MRS GREN definition of a living organism.


Movement


Pokémon definitely move. They would not be the source of entertainment they are if they just sat there all day. Some move more than others, while some barely move at all, but there is always some degree of movement capabilities.


A group of Pokémon run towards the camera.


Respiratory


We do not really see much in the way of breathing, but every now and again, we see a Pokémon that is short of breath (often being out of breath after some overly physical action such as running or taking a severe beating). You do not get short of breath if you do not need to breathe in the first place.


A Bulbasur breathes.


Sensitivity


We often see examples of physical sensitivity in Pokémon, usually after taking a big hit or being defeated in battle. We also know that they have a physical endurance level (i.e. they "take damage"), because they can be defeated in battle, and often have to be healed.


A Pikachu lies defeated after battle. Note the clear expression of pain.



Growth


Pokémon grow in two ways. They grow in size, and when they reach certain conditions, they evolve and grow into new Pokémon. We often only clearly see the size difference when the Pokémon evolves; however, in some of the games (notably Pokémon Go), you can catch the same Pokémon in a variety of heights and weights.


Eevee and its evolution Jolteon in Pokémon Go. Note the height and weight; note that they are marked as


Reproduction


We know that Pokémon reproduce, because they lay and hatch from eggs. In fact, Pokémon breeding is a commonly employed mechanic used to catch Pokémon of particular rarities and strengths.


A Wynaut hatching from an egg.


Excrement


OK, so we do not see Pokémon poop. There is a good reason for that; it is a video game and TV series primarily targeted at children. It is one of those things that just go without saying. We do, however, see references to Pokémon excrementing waste, primarily through Pokédex readings:



Darumaka's droppings are hot, so people used to put them in their clothes to keep themselves warm.

- Daramuaka's Pokédex reading in Pokémon X and Pokémon OmegaRuby


A dangerous Ultra Beast, it appears to be eating constantly, but for some reason its droppings have never been found.
- Guzzlord's Pokédex reading in Pokémon Moon



The latter has been used to say that Guzzlord does not excrete; but on the contrary, this goes to show that Pokémon in general do. After all, if they did not, it would not be any mystery why one particular Pokémon's droppings have not been found.


Nutrition


We see Pokémon eat all the time. Ensuring your Pokémon has a nutritious diet is also often an employed mechanic in-game.


Pikachu and Togepi, eating.




In summary, in contrast with part of the question, Pokémon can be considered living organisms; however, there is only discussion and debate about whether or not they are actually considered animals.



After all, Pokémon are fictional organisms. The closest real organisms we have are predominantly animals. If they existed in the real world, they could quite possibly be classed as a completely seperate organism due to the clear distinction of both ability and comprehension. Since that is not the case, we can't really try to classify them with non-fictional constraints.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...