Skip to main content

What kept the Shadows from attacking Babylon 5?


According to the 3rd and 4th seasons the Shadow ideology was about bringing out the best of the younger races by provoking conflict between them (or something along those lines). But at the beginning of the series those younger races were a hair's breadth from clashing with each other, and even one of the Shadow ships could likely have cut B5 in two with a single shot (I'm basing this on how they were seen wiping out Narn battle stations and warships so easily with little, if any damage in return).


So what stopped them from doing it? Were they still recollecting their forces? Did they not want to tip their hand too soon? Were they just not informed of current events?



Answer



(Please pardon the spoiler blocks.)


Early on,



Sheridan was seen as a possible ally. During ‘Z'ha'dum’, when he asks straight–up why the Shadows hadn't killed him yet, Justin informs Sheridan that it would be unproductive to make him a martyr.
Until that time, during the first three seasons, the Shadows weren't interested in B5 — they wanted Sheridan. It was only then that they were preparing to attack B5 directly — until the battlecrabs were called to fall–back, in response to Sheridan's own attack on Z'ha'dum with the thermonuclear weapons carried by the first White Star.




So, there we have one explanation. What about later?



Soon after — during the beginning of the fourth season, — the Shadows and the Vorlons begin cleansing the galaxy of those who've shown allegiance to the other. The Vorlons are first targetting planets which have held, or are holding, contingents of Shadow forces.
The Shadows, meanwhile, are playing a game of scatter–and–entrench. Then, when they are ready to move, they begin first attacking a few worlds which were faithful to the Vorlons. By the time ‘Into the Fire’, episode 06, comes along, the Shadows and Vorlons are going at it direct, but only because they were lured there by the White Star fleet.
They do yet want the younger races to side with their beliefs: both the Shadows and the Vorlons only attack those who have already chosen the other side.



Now, what does Babylon 5 mean to either the Shadows or the Vorlons for those episodes of season four?



Babylon 5 did have a Vorlon ambassador for quite some time, but they themselves ousted him during ‘Falling Towards Apotheosis’.

The Vorlons also knew that the Shadows had been using ever since Kosh first encountered Morden there in the first season.
So, why didn't either of them take moves to eliminate Babylon 5 when they began cleansing the galaxy during season four?

It is possible that the Great Machine in Epsilon III served as a deterrent, but we never see any evidence that its defensive weapons were used against either the Shadows or the Vorlons. That may be simply because the situations were not dire enough so as to require the intervention. We certainly don't see evidence of it intervening when the Shadows took Garibaldi.
It is also possible that neither Shadows nor Vorlons knew of the Machine. This is unlikely, however, given at least the fact that Susan Ivanova seemingly alerted the Shadows of its presence, and her use of it, during ‘Voices of Authority’, season 3, episode 05. It isn't clear exactly what is occuring during that time, and whether she is traversing some transspacial network or simply probing the databanks of the Great Machine, but Ivanova does seem to believe that something noticed her.
It would seem reasonable to conclude that the Vorlons would've learned what it was too, but we can't be certain. Nevertheless, it also seems reasonable to surmise that the Great Machine, if it would've posed a threat to either the Vorlons or the Shadows, simply would've increased the necessary firepower from either for them to do defeat Babylon 5.

So, I would argue that the fact that neither Shadows nor Vorlons made a move on Babylon 5, prior to when Sheridan and Delenn prompted them to notice the fleet of Non-Aligned Worlds which had gathered in ‘Into the Fire’, signifies that it wasn't a priority target for either of them.
I know, that seems like circular reasoning. However, if Babylon 5 were a target for either of them, we'd expect that both the Shadows and the Vorlons would've made moves to meet there to prevent the other from taking it for their own. They did no such thing.

Furthermore, it doesn't seem like either the Shadows or the Vorlons regarded the humans of B5 as contenders for their own positions until Lorien asks them to follow him out beyond the rim. They were simply one of the younger races, albeit a rather vehement race. Both the Shadows and the Vorlons continued trying to win over the humans until the very end.
This occurs in episode 06, when we see the Vorlons as a woman encased in ice and the Shadows as doppelgängers. From then on, the Shadows and the Vorlons are gone away. They don't themselves meddle with Babylon 5 later.



Those are the reasons why neither the Shadows



nor the Vorlons




attacked the Babylon 5 station.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec