Skip to main content

cosmere - Shards and the various things that happen to them, what do they mean?


From what I remember Shards can Splinter which is what creates things like the Spren (from the Stormlight Archives), but I also recall the description Sliver. Specifically "Sliver of infinity", when Vin channels Preservation (from the Mistborn trilogy).


A Splinter is, as far as I can tell, when a Shard is broken/destroyed it fragments and forms physical beings


A Sliver is, again as far as I can tell, when a Shard is wielded by someone/something and it fundamentally alters them.



I'm wondering if perhaps Nightblood from Warbreaker is some manifestation of a Shard, perhaps even some kind of Splinter.


Does anyone have a more concrete/correct definition for Splinters and Slivers, and are there other things that can happen to Shards?



Answer



The original "object" that is the source of all power in the Cosmere is called Adonalsium. It's not clear exactly what it was or where it came from, but it was eventually discovered by a group of cosmically-aware explorers.


Those people somehow (intentionally) caused Adonalsium to Shatter into 16 pieces, called Shards. A Shard is a piece of Adonalsium that represents the entire manifestation of one of the 16 facets of the original power source. These are named based on their aspect, like Honor or Devotion or Preservation. At any given him, only a single person can possess the power of a Shard.


When a person touches the power of a Shard, but does not keep it, some tiny fraction of that power stays behind in the person, and they become a Sliver. Note that not every person that holds a Shards power is considered a Sliver; for example, Preservation imbued every person on Scadriel with a tiny, almost inert portion if its power, but they aren't Slivers of Preservation. Only Vin, Rashek and Kelsier held Preservation enough to be considered Slivers. The Stormfather on Roshar is also a Sliver; specifically, he was a very powerful and primitive spren who took on part of Honor when that Shard died. The key in each case is that the holder of that power held it long enough that they "kept" some remnant of that Shard's power after it was gone, which continued to affect them (e.g. allowed Kelsier to remain in the cognitive realm much longer than he should have, gave the Stormfather his self-awareness, etc.)


(On a side note: We don't consider Sazed a Sliver because he's still holding both Shards, which makes him a Vessel. If he ever gave up Ruin/Preservation he would become a Sliver.)


A Splinter is the conceptual dual of a Sliver: it's a fraction of a Shard's power that has never been human. We still don't have a clear understanding of what exactly defines a Splinter, or where they come from, but we do know for sure which "things" we've seen so far are Splinters: Seons are Splinters of Devotion, portions of Breath are Splinters of Endowment, some of the spren on Roshar are Splinters of Honor, Cultivation, or Odium. They are self-aware, in the sense that they exist outside of and can act distinct from their Shard. But they are also bound to the "purpose" of the Shard that made them, and appear to have very limited capacity to act counter to that purpose. (See, for example, Sylph's occasional struggle to help Kaladin but being unable to do so until he meets the requirements of Honor).


(Spren are a very interesting showcase of how Shard magic works: spren are a natural phenomenon on Roshar; when the Shards ended up on the planet, each one's magic created it's own new, special types of Spren -- the ones that are self-aware and can bond humans -- that mimicked the primal ones.)


A Shard being destroyed does not seem to have anything directly to do with it being Splintered or not. As far as we know, Endowment is still alive and kicking, and Spren of Honor existed long before Tanavast was killed. We tend to use the term "splintering" a Shard to describe it's destruction, since that is what's in The Letter. But despite the strong similarity in language, there's no direct evidence that splintering a Shard is related in any way to creating Splinters.



Finally: Nightblood is not a Splinter or Sliver of anything; it's just a very very strongly Endowed object.


(Much of this is explained in the very last question from Brandon's Q&A here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

fan fiction - Does the Interdict of Merlin appear in original Harry Potter canon?

In Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality by Eliezer Yudkowsky a concept called the ' Interdict of Merlin ' appears: (all emphasis added) Chapter 23: His hand on the doorknob, Harry Potter already inside and waiting, wearing his cowled cloak. "The ancient first-year spells," Harry Potter said. "What did you find?" "They're no more powerful than the spells we use now." Harry Potter's fist struck a desk, hard. "Damn it. All right. My own experiment was a failure, Draco. There's something called the Interdict of Merlin -" Draco hit himself on the forehead, realizing. "- which stops anyone from getting knowledge of powerful spells out of books, even if you find and read a powerful wizard's notes they won't make sense to you, it has to go from one living mind to another. I couldn't find any powerful spells that we had the instructions for but couldn't cast. But if you can't get them out of old books,

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec