Skip to main content

What is the recommended order for the books and the games of the Witcher?


With the (relatively) recent release of the third game and the recommendation of a friend, I'd like to discover this universe.


I know there are several media; the books, the video games (though to be honest, I don't intend to play the first video game) and a TV series (also still unsure about that one), but I know almost nothing about how they intervene together storywise.


The books alone have me a little confused, given that the numbering of the edition I'm planning to buy (from the french editor Milady) doesn't seem to exactly match the original order of release:



Season of Storms (2013)
1. The Last Wish (1993)
2. Sword of Destiny (1992)
3. Blood of Elves (1994)
4. Time of Contempt (1995)

5. Baptism of Fire (1996)
6. The Swallow's Tower (1997)
7. Lady of the Lake (1999)



So, what is the best order, potentially mixing the various media, to discover the saga ?



Answer




It's not really too complicated. You can basically stick to the release order (of the original books, the English translations seem to lag behind quite a bit and might be out of order), as depicted by Wikipedia, except for a minor switch. Well, first of all, there are basically three different kinds of stories concerning the Witcher written by Sapkowski.


(The spoiler blocks in the answer are not really spoilers at all but only very rough details that could as well be blurbs from the backs of the book, but I blocked them nevertheless as you can never be sure what people really consider a spoiler.)


The short stories



There are the more-or-less independent short stories, primarily published in Sword of Destiny (Miecz przeznaczenia, 1992) and The Last Wish (Ostatnie zyczenie, 1993).


The individual short stories are largely independent of each other and could maybe even be read completely discontinuous across book boundaries. However, there are a few connections between some of them. In addition to that, The Last Wish actually features a frame story to serve for the short stories to be told as flashbacks (the frame story itself is not too relevant for the bigger picture, though, as much as I remember). So it is indeed advised to read the books as a whole each.


Now what about the order of the two books? In fact you should read The Last Wish before Sword of Destiny. While they aren't too connected, the in-universe chronological order is rather this way (as Sword of Destiny actually ends with



the war against Nilfgaard beginning, which is the major war that the novel series is set against



and because both books feature short stories that are highly relevant to the novel series, in addition to other minor character developments.


This slight order switch is grounded in the fact that many of the stories from The Last Wish were actually published in an earlier book (The Witcher (Wiedzmin, 1990)) and only collected into the frame story in The Last Wish later.


(The collection Something ends, Something begins (Coś się kończy, coś się zaczyna, 2000) contains two stories related to Geralt but as much as I know (haven't read them admittedly) they don't really have much significance for the broader matters at all (one of them is supposedly depicting the marriage of Geralt and Yennefer as the collection itself was supposedly written for a friend of Sapkowski who was getting married or something like that). Neither does there seem to have been any effort in translating Something ends, Something begins into the English language yet.)


The novel series



Then there's the 5-part series of novels, comprised of Blood of Elves (Krew elfów, 1994), Time of Contempt (Czas pogardy, 1995), Baptism of Fire (Chrzest ognia, 1996), The Swallow's Tower (Wieza Jaskólki, 1997), and Lady of the Lake (Pani Jeziora, 1999). Those indeed tell a closed and continuous story and should thus be read one after the other in release order.


This series is chronologically set after the short stories and should thus be read after them (as also released afterwards). It does not depend too closely on all the short stories, but there are a few important connection points:



  • There's the whole story about Cirilla, Geralt's "child of surprise", about whom the series is primarily centered.

    Her background was first introduced in the short story "A Matter of Price" from The Last Wish and later continued in "The Sword of Destiny" and "Something More" from Sword of Destiny. (Ignoring possible additional minor references to Ciri in other short stories.)




  • There are other minor characters recurring in some of the short stories and referenced throughout the novel series, foremost Geralt's on-and-off love interest Yennefer of Vengerberg,


    a relationship primarily developed in "The Last Wish" from The Last Wish and picked up later in "The Bounds of Reason", "A Shard of Ice", and "Something More" from Sword of Destiny.





Additional novels


And then there is the rather new Season of Storms (Sezon burz, 2013). This is a standalone novel supposedly set during the time of The Last Wish or between that and Sword of Destiny.



In particular the striga haunting Temeria is mentioned at the end of Season of Storms. So it seems to be set before the first story "The Witcher" from The Last Wish, which in turn leads to the frame narration that engulfs the rest of the flashback short stories in that book.



While it doesn't rely on any of the short stories per se, it employs major characters introduced in them, especially Dandelion and to a smaller degree Yennefer, and afterall Geralt himself and his whole background as a witcher, and doesn't care much to reintroduce them again. So it definitely helps to have read The Last Wish at least.



Since it is pretty much a prequel to the novel series, it naturally doesn't really spoil anything from there. However, it uses a minor character from the novel series, but only in two short interludes and you don't really have to know who she is (or will become) to fully grasp the story there, it's mainly just a small recognizing "aha" moment (that might as well work the other way around). And while it is interesting to see the slightly ambiguous ending of Season of Storms in relation to the ending of the novel series regarding its motifs, that connection might as well work the other way around, too. You certainly don't have to know the ending of the novel series at all and neither is it really spoiled.


It should thus not be too relevant if you read it after The Last Wish, between the short stories and the series, or just after all the other books. But sticking to release order (i.e. reading it last) can't hurt, since it was certainly published this way and likely intended by Sapkowski to also be consumed that way, especially seeing the large 14-year gap since the release of the novel series.




So long story short, you should be set fine when just sticking to (original) release order but switching the two short story collections, pretty much like you already outlined it in your question:



  1. The Last Wish

  2. Sword of Destiny

  3. Blood of Elves

  4. Time of Contempt

  5. Baptism of Fire


  6. The Swallow's Tower

  7. Lady of the Lake

  8. Season of Storms (might also be consumed earlier)





The video games are not particularly canonical for the larger matter and are only an unofficial continuation of the books (as also discussed in this related question and its answers) and I doubt Sapkowski was actually involved in creating them at all (personally they are quite enjoyable, though, and actually what brought me to this universe, too). However, they are set after the novel series but only loosely reference past events and don't really spoil anything there, nor require anything to be known beforehand. They do to some degree replicate some of the things from the books in the video game as actual plot points, though, be that only as faint allusions. But you can really play them whenever you want.





The Polish television series from 2002 is actually an adaptation of the short stories from The Last Wish and Sword of Destiny. It was also released before the TV release in 2001 as a movie in a more compressed form. While the TV-show/movie were largely panned by critics, fans, and the author himself, it is at least an interesting watch if you have read the two short story collections and want to see them in audiovisual form.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...