Skip to main content

doctor who - With which mindset should I watch Dr. Who?



I understand this is a very odd question but I have to ask because the Dr. Who story-line is unlike any other sci-fi series I have ever watched. It is fun but I am struggling a bit to find a mindset that will help me enjoy this series as much as possible.


A quick bit of background. My wife and I are total nerds. Recently, we happened to watch a couple of the most recent episodes of Dr. Who on the US-BBC channel. We tried hard to fight it but we have been sucked into the show and are now "binging" on Dr. Who episodes, starting with season 5.



After watching one full season, I can't quite grip how I should process this show. What I mean is that with every sci-fi universe that's been developed, you have to enter the story with a few assumptions and you have to "forgive" the writer(s) for certain, impractical details. Generally speaking, I've developed 3 mindsets. Of these three mindsets, I try to adopt one of them, in order to be able to enjoy the story. They are as listed below.


The Star Trek Mindset


This type of story is high on science and tries to base the story around a universe that is reasonably plausible. You can forgive some scientific inaccuracies if the science-of-the-story is integral to the plot. In general, however, the world/universe should be considered close to the one we live in. Continuity in the story line is important but it can be broken if it rectifies scientific mistakes from earlier series assumptions.


The LOST Mindset


This is a story where continuity is of the utmost importance. Questions should be asked and answers are to be expected. Scientific gibberish can add a layer of fun to the story, but don't consider it to align with reality. The key hear is to enjoy the curiosity surrounded by the story that is being told and you should pay close attention to every detail, for clues to future story development.


The STAR WARS Mindset


Continuity is only somewhat important but legitimate science should be forgotten. For this type of story it is almost best to throw out both ideas and simply "enjoy the ride." For this story, you should enjoy the characters, bask in starships exploding in the roar of space and not ask questions. Just have fun!



As I mentioned, I try to adopt one of these mindsets with any new series that I watch. If I don't, I'll end up being annoyed by inconsistencies that I see throughout the story. I need to have a few base assumptions so that I can forgive the writers for minor inconsistencies that may occur in the story.


However, with Dr. Who I feel that my "mindset" has to shift from episode-to-episode. The default may be to adopt the STAR WARS style mindset, but I can't seem to think from that perspective when the story continually encourages you to pay attention to continuity details.



Also, the writers tend to portray that the Dr. Who universe has a "science" all of it's own that should be consistent within the universe. This may not follow the laws of our physical world, but it seems that I should at least pay attention to the details of the Dr. Who universe because it could be important to the story that's being told


TL;DR


Considering the information stated above, what assumptions should I maintain about the plot, questions and answers, and the general "science" of the Dr. Who universe while watching Dr. Who?



Answer



I offer you a Fourth Mindset: Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy Mindset.


Things like continuity are somewhat maintained, until it gets in the way with good story in which case it is manipulated, or outright dismissed.


Expect rules to change, in particular between doctors, and most especially between old and new versions of Doctor Who.


Plot and story are maintained, however rules are often arbitrary and necessarily so to hold up the framework of the ongoing plot.


Some rules remain somewhat firm (such as sonic devices not working on wood), and some themes reoccur, but in the end each writer/doctor/companion is given free reign to re-imagine the story based on the bedrock foundation.


Scientific reliability has no place in Doctor Who at all.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...
Post a Comment
Read more