Skip to main content

doctor who - With which mindset should I watch Dr. Who?



I understand this is a very odd question but I have to ask because the Dr. Who story-line is unlike any other sci-fi series I have ever watched. It is fun but I am struggling a bit to find a mindset that will help me enjoy this series as much as possible.


A quick bit of background. My wife and I are total nerds. Recently, we happened to watch a couple of the most recent episodes of Dr. Who on the US-BBC channel. We tried hard to fight it but we have been sucked into the show and are now "binging" on Dr. Who episodes, starting with season 5.



After watching one full season, I can't quite grip how I should process this show. What I mean is that with every sci-fi universe that's been developed, you have to enter the story with a few assumptions and you have to "forgive" the writer(s) for certain, impractical details. Generally speaking, I've developed 3 mindsets. Of these three mindsets, I try to adopt one of them, in order to be able to enjoy the story. They are as listed below.


The Star Trek Mindset


This type of story is high on science and tries to base the story around a universe that is reasonably plausible. You can forgive some scientific inaccuracies if the science-of-the-story is integral to the plot. In general, however, the world/universe should be considered close to the one we live in. Continuity in the story line is important but it can be broken if it rectifies scientific mistakes from earlier series assumptions.


The LOST Mindset


This is a story where continuity is of the utmost importance. Questions should be asked and answers are to be expected. Scientific gibberish can add a layer of fun to the story, but don't consider it to align with reality. The key hear is to enjoy the curiosity surrounded by the story that is being told and you should pay close attention to every detail, for clues to future story development.


The STAR WARS Mindset


Continuity is only somewhat important but legitimate science should be forgotten. For this type of story it is almost best to throw out both ideas and simply "enjoy the ride." For this story, you should enjoy the characters, bask in starships exploding in the roar of space and not ask questions. Just have fun!




As I mentioned, I try to adopt one of these mindsets with any new series that I watch. If I don't, I'll end up being annoyed by inconsistencies that I see throughout the story. I need to have a few base assumptions so that I can forgive the writers for minor inconsistencies that may occur in the story.


However, with Dr. Who I feel that my "mindset" has to shift from episode-to-episode. The default may be to adopt the STAR WARS style mindset, but I can't seem to think from that perspective when the story continually encourages you to pay attention to continuity details.



Also, the writers tend to portray that the Dr. Who universe has a "science" all of it's own that should be consistent within the universe. This may not follow the laws of our physical world, but it seems that I should at least pay attention to the details of the Dr. Who universe because it could be important to the story that's being told


TL;DR


Considering the information stated above, what assumptions should I maintain about the plot, questions and answers, and the general "science" of the Dr. Who universe while watching Dr. Who?



Answer



I offer you a Fourth Mindset: Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy Mindset.


Things like continuity are somewhat maintained, until it gets in the way with good story in which case it is manipulated, or outright dismissed.


Expect rules to change, in particular between doctors, and most especially between old and new versions of Doctor Who.


Plot and story are maintained, however rules are often arbitrary and necessarily so to hold up the framework of the ongoing plot.


Some rules remain somewhat firm (such as sonic devices not working on wood), and some themes reoccur, but in the end each writer/doctor/companion is given free reign to re-imagine the story based on the bedrock foundation.


Scientific reliability has no place in Doctor Who at all.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

fan fiction - Does the Interdict of Merlin appear in original Harry Potter canon?

In Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality by Eliezer Yudkowsky a concept called the ' Interdict of Merlin ' appears: (all emphasis added) Chapter 23: His hand on the doorknob, Harry Potter already inside and waiting, wearing his cowled cloak. "The ancient first-year spells," Harry Potter said. "What did you find?" "They're no more powerful than the spells we use now." Harry Potter's fist struck a desk, hard. "Damn it. All right. My own experiment was a failure, Draco. There's something called the Interdict of Merlin -" Draco hit himself on the forehead, realizing. "- which stops anyone from getting knowledge of powerful spells out of books, even if you find and read a powerful wizard's notes they won't make sense to you, it has to go from one living mind to another. I couldn't find any powerful spells that we had the instructions for but couldn't cast. But if you can't get them out of old books,

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec