Skip to main content

harry potter - What protection does Hogwarts have at the school entrance?


In Prisoner of Azkaban, Cornelius Fudge decides that the dementors are no longer appropriate protection after they tried to steal Harry's soul with the Dementor's Kiss. He then says the following:



No, I’ll have them packed off back to Azkaban tonight. Perhaps we should think about dragons at the school entrance ...’ -Prison of Azkaban



I find it interesting that dragons at the school entrance were considered, but to my knowledge, this never happened. By the time of The Half-Blood Prince, the school entrances were secure enough that the Death Eaters couldn't just waltz in, requiring them to use the teleporting cabinets instead.


So what type of protection does Hogwarts have at the school entrance (by which I mean the intended entrance, not hidden ways into the school)? And aside from the presence of the dementors, did this change over the course of the books?



Answer




Not much, until Voldemort's return


For most of the books, there is no particular magical protection on the gates. Of course, presumably the gates have Muggle-Repelling Charms on them, like the rest of the castle, and they are undoubtedly included in other spells as well, but they seem to have no special magical protection. People (or at least witches and wizards) can walk through them at will. For example, in Goblet of Fire the Trio can simply run through the gates:



Breaking into a run, she led them all the way back up the road, through the gates flanked by winged boars, and up through the grounds to Hagrid’s cabin.


—Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire



Of course, after the escape of Sirius Black dementors were posted at the gates. Fudge's suggestion that dragons be put at the gates was in the context of Sirius's continued freedom, but Sirius indicated that he would allow himself to be seen far from Hogwarts, in order to get the Ministry to lift security.



I am planning to allow some Muggles to glimpse me soon, a long way from Hogwarts, so that the security on the castle will be lifted.


—Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban




After the public return of Lord Voldemort, security was stepped up massively, and the gates received some extra protection.


At the very least, the gates cannot be unlocked through magical means:



But when he put out a hand to push open the gates, he found them chained shut.


“Alohomora!” he said confidently, pointing his wand at the padlock, but nothing happened.


“That won’t work on these,” said Tonks. “Dumbledore bewitched them himself.”


—Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince



Note the word "them": the spell is on the gates as a whole, not just the padlock.This protection is presumably specific to the gates, since the walls and grounds cannot be opened in the first place.



The gates also probably have anti-intruder jinxes of some sort:



“I could climb a wall,” he suggested.


“No, you couldn’t,” said Tonks flatly. “Anti-intruder jinxes on all of them. Security’s been tightened a hundredfold this summer.”


—Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince



If such jinxes have been placed on the walls, it seems very likely that they also were placed on the gates.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...