StarWars wikia is somewhat unclear here. It says
Near-Human was the general term for any of the many species or subspecies in the galaxy which were very closely related biologically to baseline Humans.
Does "related biologically" mean actually having a common ancestor? If so, what's the history behind that? Is it some kind of Panspermia thing like The Chase in Star Trek? Or something ancient and unknown?
Lets ignore the bit about
It was also used for unrelated species
I am only talking about Near-human related species. What does related mean? Does it mean related by evolution or simply relatively similar (convergent evolution)?
Answer
It was used for both a common genetic ancestor, and beings that simply looked as though they had a common genetic ancestor. From your own link:
The term "Near-Human" was used for species and races which had evolved significant physiological differences from baseline Humanity. It was also used for unrelated species, such as the plant-descended Zelosians, with substantial external similarities to Humans.
It further references this post on the official Star Wars Blog, which includes this sentence:
These were often a strain of human being that had evolved distinct and unsettling qualities, such as the four-fingered, pupilless Arkanians, yet also encompassed species such as Zelosians, superficially identical to humans but physiologically plant-based.
Comments
Post a Comment