Skip to main content

Isn't the bomb in 'Pacific Rim' a bit small?


In Pacific Rim their plan is to throw a 1.2 megatons nuclear bomb into the breach.


Although this is reasonably sizeable for a nuke (Hiroshima was only 12.5 kilotons, about a thousand times less powerful) I would have thought that they would use something like the 58-Megaton Tsar-bomba.



Is there something I did not consider, or is there a mistake in the movie?



Answer



They couldn't build a bigger bomb because they didn't have the material.


In an earlier version of the script we learn that they'd tried (repeatedly) blowing up the Kaiju and the rift with nuclear bombs and had since depleted the world's supply of weaponisable Uranium.



LETHBRIDGE : It doesn't matter. There can't be a bomb. We're past peak uranium...


JIAO : He's right. The mines have all but dried up. We have no single source that could provide enough material.


[Raleigh speaks up from the back. In an earlier version of the script we learn that they'd tried (repeatedly) blowing up the Kaiju and the rift with nuclear bombs and had since depleted the world's supply of weaponisable Uranium.]


RALEIGH : Yes we do. The Mark-1's. That's what we did with the last of the uranium. We used it to power the first Jaegers. Like Gipsy Danger..




On top of that, the film transcript makes it quite clear that the aim is to "collapse" the rift rather than simply blowing the enemy into smithereens. Their modelling may well indicate an optimum yield size rather than a mentality of simply hitting it with "the biggest bomb ever built" in the hope that brute force will work.



"And this is what we call "The Throat," the passage between the Breach and us. We know that it's atomic in nature.


I predict that the increased traffic will force the Breach to stabilize and remain open long enough to get the device through and collapse its structure."



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...